Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Brodsky, Kushner, Rein, Chukhontsev. Author’s myths of 1970s poets through the prism of neotraditionalism

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-2-45-61

Abstract

The article sets out to summarize the values and principles at the core of the creative world of four major poets active since the 1970s: J. Brodsky, A. Kushner, Y. Rein, and O. Chukhontsev. To that end, the study examines the so-called ‘author’s myths’ of these poets, which epitomize their artistic worlds. In his analysis of poetry, V. Kozlov uses a genre approach. Therefore, a key revolution of Brodsky’s poetics and worldview is linked to his “breaking away from the elegy and into the ode,” Kushner’s lyric poetry appears to contain an idyllic element, while Rein and Chukhontsev develop the elegiac tradition — the difference, according to Kozlov, is that Rein specializes in ‘urban’ elegy, and Chukhontsev — in its ‘historical’ counterpart. The scholar especially considers the category of time and its utmost relevance for all four poets. Kozlov suggests that the common characteristics of the four selected poets reveal them as neotraditionalists and, at the same time, help clarify the neotraditionalist poetics that typified Russian poetry in the 20th century.

About the Author

V. I. Kozlov
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Kozlov, Doctor of Philology

93 Universitetsky Ln., Rostov-on-Don, 344006



References

1. Oborin, L., ed. (2025). The Bookshelf [Polka]: History of Russian poetry. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction. (In Russ.)

2. Rodnyanskaya, I. (2006). A poet between the immediate and the eternal. In: I. Rodnyanskaya, The movement of literature (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Znak: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 90-113. (In Russ.)

3. Sklyarov, O. (2014). Neotraditionalism in 20th­century Russian literature: Philosophical and aesthetic intentions and artistic strategies. Thesis. Doctor of Philology. Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)

4. Smirnov, I. (2000). ‘Historical avant-garde’ as a subsystem of post-symbolist culture. In: I. Smirnov, Megahistory. Moscow: AGRAF, pp. 98-196. (In Russ.)

5. Tyupa, V. (2005). Brodsky’s Nobel lecture as a manifesto of neotraditionalism. In: Joseph Brodsky: Reading strategies. Proceedings of the international scientific conference ‘The Worlds of Joseph Brodsky. Reading Strategies.’ Moscow: Izdatelstvo Ippolitova, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.)

6. Tyupa, V. (2018). Literature and mentality. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Yurayt. (In Russ.)

7. Vatsuro, V. (2002). Pushkin’s lyric poetry. ‘The Elegiac School.’ St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)

8. Veselovsky, A. (2006). Selected works: Historical poetics. Ed. by I. Shaytanov. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kozlov V.I. Brodsky, Kushner, Rein, Chukhontsev. Author’s myths of 1970s poets through the prism of neotraditionalism. Voprosy literatury. 2026;(2):45-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-2-45-61

Views: 56

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)