<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voplit</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы литературы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy literatury</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31425/0042-8795-2026-2-45-61</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voplit-893</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИТЕРАТУРНОЕ СЕГОДНЯ. Понятия, о которых спорят</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RUSSIAN LITERATURE TODAY. The Concepts We Talk About</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Бродский, Кушнер, Рейн, Чухонцев. Авторские мифы семидесятников в свете неотрадиционализма</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Brodsky, Kushner, Rein, Chukhontsev. Author’s myths of 1970s poets through the prism of neotraditionalism</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Козлов</surname><given-names>В. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kozlov</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Владимир Иванович Козлов, доктор филологических наук</p><p>344006, г. Ростов-на-Дону, Университетский пер., д. 93</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vladimir I. Kozlov, Doctor of Philology</p><p>93 Universitetsky Ln., Rostov-on-Don, 344006</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">vikozlov@sfedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Южный федеральный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Southern Federal University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury», 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/893">https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/893</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье предпринята попытка показать общие ценности и принципы формирования художественного мира четырех крупных поэтов-семидесятников — И. Бродского, А. Кушнера, Е. Рейна, О. Чухонцева. В частности, рассмотрены так называемые авторские мифы поэтов, выражающие квинтэссенцию их художественных миров. Общие черты выбранных поэтов, с одной стороны, показывают их как неотрадиционалистов, с другой — позволяют лучше прояснить саму поэтику неотрадиционализма, характерную для русской поэзии XX века.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article sets out to summarize the values and principles at the core of the creative world of four major poets active since the 1970s: J. Brodsky, A. Kushner, Y. Rein, and O. Chukhontsev. To that end, the study examines the so-called ‘author’s myths’ of these poets, which epitomize their artistic worlds. In his analysis of poetry, V. Kozlov uses a genre approach. Therefore, a key revolution of Brodsky’s poetics and worldview is linked to his “breaking away from the elegy and into the ode,” Kushner’s lyric poetry appears to contain an idyllic element, while Rein and Chukhontsev develop the elegiac tradition — the difference, according to Kozlov, is that Rein specializes in ‘urban’ elegy, and Chukhontsev — in its ‘historical’ counterpart. The scholar especially considers the category of time and its utmost relevance for all four poets. Kozlov suggests that the common characteristics of the four selected poets reveal them as neotraditionalists and, at the same time, help clarify the neotraditionalist poetics that typified Russian poetry in the 20th century.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>И. Бродский</kwd><kwd>А. Кушнер</kwd><kwd>Е. Рейн</kwd><kwd>О. Чухонцев</kwd><kwd>русская поэзия</kwd><kwd>семидесятники</kwd><kwd>неотрадиционализм</kwd><kwd>авторский мир</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>J. Brodsky</kwd><kwd>A. Kushner</kwd><kwd>Y. Rein</kwd><kwd>O. Chukhontsev</kwd><kwd>Russian poetry</kwd><kwd>semidesyatniki [poets of the 1970s]</kwd><kwd>neotraditionalism</kwd><kwd>author’s myth</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вацуро В. Э. Лирика пушкинской поры. «Элегическая школа». СПб.: Наука, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oborin, L., ed. (2025). The Bookshelf [Polka]: History of Russian poetry. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Веселовский А. Н. Избранное: Историческая поэтика / Сост., вступ. ст., послесл., коммент. И. О. Шайтанова. М.: РОССПЭН, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodnyanskaya, I. (2006). A poet between the immediate and the eternal. In: I. Rodnyanskaya, The movement of literature (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Znak: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 90-113. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полка: История русской поэзии / Под общ. ред. Л. Оборина. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2025.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sklyarov, O. (2014). Neotraditionalism in 20th­century Russian literature: Philosophical and aesthetic intentions and artistic strategies. Thesis. Doctor of Philology. Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Роднянская И. Б. Поэт меж ближайшим и вечным // Роднянская И. Б. Движение литературы. В 2 тт. М.: Знак: Языки славянских культур, 2006. С. 90–113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smirnov, I. (2000). ‘Historical avant-garde’ as a subsystem of post-symbolist culture. In: I. Smirnov, Megahistory. Moscow: AGRAF, pp. 98-196. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скляров О. Н. Неотрадиционализм в русской литературе XX века: философско-эстетические интенции и художественные стратегии: Дисс. &lt;…&gt; докт. филол. наук. М., 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tyupa, V. (2005). Brodsky’s Nobel lecture as a manifesto of neotraditionalism. In: Joseph Brodsky: Reading strategies. Proceedings of the international scientific conference ‘The Worlds of Joseph Brodsky. Reading Strategies.’ Moscow: Izdatelstvo Ippolitova, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смирнов И. П. «Исторический авангард» как подсистема постсимволистской культуры // Смирнов И. П. Мегаистория. М.: АГРАФ, 2000. С. 98–196.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tyupa, V. (2018). Literature and mentality. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Yurayt. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тюпа В. И. Нобелевская лекция Бродского как манифест неотрадиционализма // Иосиф Бродский: стратегии чтения. Материалы Международной научной конференции «Миры Иосифа Бродского: стратегии чтения». М.: Издательство Ипполитова, 2005. С. 13–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vatsuro, V. (2002). Pushkin’s lyric poetry. ‘The Elegiac School.’ St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тюпа В. И. Литература и ментальность. М.: Издательство Юрайт, 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veselovsky, A. (2006). Selected works: Historical poetics. Ed. by I. Shaytanov. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
