Brodsky, Kushner, Rein, Chukhontsev. Author’s myths of 1970s poets through the prism of neotraditionalism
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-2-45-61
Abstract
The article sets out to summarize the values and principles at the core of the creative world of four major poets active since the 1970s: J. Brodsky, A. Kushner, Y. Rein, and O. Chukhontsev. To that end, the study examines the so-called ‘author’s myths’ of these poets, which epitomize their artistic worlds. In his analysis of poetry, V. Kozlov uses a genre approach. Therefore, a key revolution of Brodsky’s poetics and worldview is linked to his “breaking away from the elegy and into the ode,” Kushner’s lyric poetry appears to contain an idyllic element, while Rein and Chukhontsev develop the elegiac tradition — the difference, according to Kozlov, is that Rein specializes in ‘urban’ elegy, and Chukhontsev — in its ‘historical’ counterpart. The scholar especially considers the category of time and its utmost relevance for all four poets. Kozlov suggests that the common characteristics of the four selected poets reveal them as neotraditionalists and, at the same time, help clarify the neotraditionalist poetics that typified Russian poetry in the 20th century.
About the Author
V. I. KozlovRussian Federation
Vladimir I. Kozlov, Doctor of Philology
93 Universitetsky Ln., Rostov-on-Don, 344006
References
1. Oborin, L., ed. (2025). The Bookshelf [Polka]: History of Russian poetry. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction. (In Russ.)
2. Rodnyanskaya, I. (2006). A poet between the immediate and the eternal. In: I. Rodnyanskaya, The movement of literature (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Znak: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 90-113. (In Russ.)
3. Sklyarov, O. (2014). Neotraditionalism in 20thcentury Russian literature: Philosophical and aesthetic intentions and artistic strategies. Thesis. Doctor of Philology. Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)
4. Smirnov, I. (2000). ‘Historical avant-garde’ as a subsystem of post-symbolist culture. In: I. Smirnov, Megahistory. Moscow: AGRAF, pp. 98-196. (In Russ.)
5. Tyupa, V. (2005). Brodsky’s Nobel lecture as a manifesto of neotraditionalism. In: Joseph Brodsky: Reading strategies. Proceedings of the international scientific conference ‘The Worlds of Joseph Brodsky. Reading Strategies.’ Moscow: Izdatelstvo Ippolitova, pp. 13-18. (In Russ.)
6. Tyupa, V. (2018). Literature and mentality. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Yurayt. (In Russ.)
7. Vatsuro, V. (2002). Pushkin’s lyric poetry. ‘The Elegiac School.’ St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
8. Veselovsky, A. (2006). Selected works: Historical poetics. Ed. by I. Shaytanov. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kozlov V.I. Brodsky, Kushner, Rein, Chukhontsev. Author’s myths of 1970s poets through the prism of neotraditionalism. Voprosy literatury. 2026;(2):45-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-2-45-61
JATS XML






























