Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Why Ďurišin?
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-3-132-141
Abstract
On the chronological list of the foremost comparatists — after Curtius, Auerbach and ahead of Guillén, Casanova, Moretti, Damrosch — one comes across the name of the Slovak scholar Dionýz Ďurišin (1929–1996). On this list he represents the 1970s–1980s. He has been widely translated into European languages since the publication of his early Theory of Literary Comparatistics (1975). ‘Theory’ was not the word that readily agreed with comparative study from its positivist beginning, but after its ‘crisis’ in the 1950s, comparatistics was in search for theory. Ďurišin’s book was received as the first attempt in this direction. From the scholar based in socialist Slovakia it was natural to expect good acquaintance with the Russian tradition of literary study. Ďurišin lavishly drew on Viktor Zhirmunsky and via his work on Aleksandr Veselovsky’s historical poetics. This basis allowed him to move towards building up a comparative theory looked for in his time. Thus, Ďurišin’s achievement is considered important as a lead to problematize such notions as ‘world literature,’ and to make a pioneering attempt to classify and systematize comparative study.
About the Author
I. O. Shaytanov
Russian State University for the Humanities; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor O. Shaytanov, Doctor of Philology
6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047
References
1. D’haen, Th., Dominguez, C. and Rosendahl Thomsen, M., eds. (2012). World literature. A reader. London; New York: Routledge.
2. Dmitrieva, E. (2024). Rene Etiemble. “Reasons of Comparative Literature, or, Comparison is not Reason.” Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 163-171. (In Russ.)
3. Dominguez, C., Saussy, H. and Villanueva, D. (2015). Introducing comparative literature. New trends and applications. London; New York: Routledge.
4. Ďurišin, D. (1979). Theory of literary comparatistics. Translated by I. Bogdanova. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
5. Ďurišin, D. (2012). World literature as a target literary-historical category. In: Th. D’haen, C. Dominguez and M. Rosendahl Thomsen, eds., World literature. A reader. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 150-159.
6. Karateeva, T. (2001). “Where past and present are gathered.” A. Akhmatova’s “Poem without a Hero” [“Poema bez geroya”] and Eliot’s “Four Quartets.” Vsemirnoe Slovo, 14, pp. 91-94. (In Russ.)
7. Levin, H. (1968). Comparing the literature. Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, 17, pp. 5-16.
8. Markova, M. (2024). Rene Wellek. “The concept of comparative literature.” Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 146-153. (In Russ.)
9. Miner, E. (1988). Possible canons of literary transmittal and appropriation. Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, 38, pp. 109-112.
10. Penkina, A. (2016). Reflections on Dante as an exposition of their own views on the nature of poetic speech in O. E. Mandelstam’s “Conversation about Dante” [“Razgovor o Dante”] and T. S. Eliot’s article “Tradition and Individual Talent.” In: Belaya Readings: Marking the 85th Birthday Anniversary of Galina Andreevna Belaya: Collected papers. Moscow: Editus, pp. 223-229. (In Russ.)
11. Shaytanov, I. (2023). Comparative/historical poetics in an age of cultural studies. Style, 57(1), pp. 1-10.
12. Shaytanov, I. (2024a). ‘Crisis’ in comparative literature and the perspective to overcome. Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 135-145. (In Russ.)
13. Shaytanov, I. (2024b). Henry H. Remak. “Comparative literature at the crossroads: Diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.” Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 154-162. (In Russ.)
14. Veselovsky, A. (2006). The most important directions in the study of storytelling. In: A. Veselovsky, Historical poetics. Ed. by I. Shaytanov. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga, pp. 543-554. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shaytanov I.O. Why Ďurišin? Voprosy literatury. 2026;(3):132-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-3-132-141
Views:
14
JATS XML
Email this article 
