|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Gender inversion in the ‘critique of a critic’. Zinaida Gippius on Korney Chukovsky
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-1-163-178
Abstract
Examined in the article is an obscure feuilleton called ‘An immature critic’ [‘Nevzrosliy kritik’] (1914), penned by Anton Krayniy (Z. Gippius) with Korney Chukovsky in mind. The article sets out to identify the role of gender inversion in the feuilleton’s intended purpose and unique genre characteristics. Having analysed the semantics of two variants of the title and subtitle (‘A study in inverted commas’ [‘Etyud v kavychkakh’]), critical techniques and quotation strategies, the scholar finds that Gippius’ metacritical piece is a spoof. A female critic (in a male disguise) expounds on the ‘feminine soul’ of a male critic, employing his own techniques and making a witty use of a female stereotype according to Weininger (‘a prostitute’). It appears that the feuilleton’s initial title implied not just an individual characteristic of Chukovsky’s, but ‘journalistic prostitution’ in general and critical feuilletons in particular — a genre practised by Gippius as well. The final choice of the title stresses the distinction of Krayniy’s journalistic (‘masculine’) criticism from the aesthetic (‘feminine,’ ‘immature’) criticism espoused by Chukovsky.
About the Author
S. V. Fedotova
A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Fedotova, Doctor of Philology
25a Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069
References
1. Aleksandrova, E. and Aleksandrov, A. (2020). Feuilleton criticism of the late 19th — early 20th c.: Problems of studies. Filologicheskie Nauki, 3, pp. 127-136. (In Russ.)
2. Andrushchenko, E. (2012). The lord of the ‘alien.’ Textology and problems of Merezhkovsky’s poetics. Moscow: Vodoley. (In Russ.)
3. Berman, D. (1999). Korney Chukovsky. A biobibliographical index. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura RAN. (In Russ.)
4. Chukovskaya, E., ed. (2012a). The collected works of K. Chukovsky (15 vols). Vol. 6. Moscow: Agentstvo FTM, Ltd. (In Russ.)
5. Chukovskaya, E., ed. (2012b). The collected works of K. Chukovsky (15 vols). Vol. 7. Moscow: Agentstvo FTM, Ltd. (In Russ.)
6. Chukovskaya, E., ed. (2013). The collected works of K. Chukovsky (15 vols). Vol. 11. Moscow: Agentstvo FTM, Ltd. (In Russ.)
7. Eichenwald, Y. (1994). Silhouettes of Russian writers. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)
8. Fedotova, S. (2021). ‘An interesting fellow’: Letters of Z. N. Gippius and D. S. Merezhkovsky to K. I. Chukovsky (1907-1920). Literaturniy Fakt, 20(2), pp. 31-81. (In Russ.)
9. Fedotova, S. and Sobolev, A. (2021). ‘…I’ll demand a lot of you’: Letters of Dmitry Filosofov to Korney Chukovsky (1908-1919). In: A. Kholikov and E. Orlova, eds., Russian literature and journalism during the pre-revolutionary period: Forms of interaction and analysis methodology. Moscow: IMLI RAN, pp. 400-455. (In Russ.)
10. Gechtman, M. (2007). Bibliography of lifetime editions and publications of Z. N. Gippius. Moscow: Intelvak. (In Russ.)
11. Krayniy, A. (1914). An immature critic. A study in inverted commas. Otkliki: Free Supplement to The Day newspaper, 8 May (supplement to issue 123), pp. 1-3. (In Russ.)
12. Osipovich, T. (2006). ‘...But she was not really a woman’: Zinaida Gippius and the problem of the ‘feminine’ in Russian culture at the turn of the 20th c. In: L. Repina, ed., Adam & Eve. An almanac of gender history, [online] Issue 12. Moscow: Institut vseobshchey istorii RAN. Available at: https://clck.ru/U9SJT [Accessed 15 Mar. 2021]. (In Russ.)
13. Paolini, M. (2002). Z. N. Gippius’ literary criticism of 1899-1918: A bibliographical introduction. In: N. Korolyova, ed., Zinaida Gippius. New research. Materials. Moscow: IMLI RAN, pp. 358-380. (In Russ.)
14. Pavlova, M. (1999). Martyrs of the great religious process. In: D. Merezhkovsky, Z. Gippius and D. Filosofov, Tsar and revolution. Moscow: OGI, pp. 7-56. (In Russ.)
15. Petrova, M., ed. (2005). Chronicle of literary events in Russia in the late 19th — early 20th c. (1891 — October 1917). Issue 3 (1911 — October 1917). Moscow: IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)
16. Prokopov, Т., ed. (2003a). The collected works of Z. Gippius (15 vols). Vol. 7. Moscow: Russkaya kniga. (In Russ.)
17. Prokopov, Т., ed. (2003b). The collected works of Z. Gippius (15 vols). Vol. 8. Moscow: Russkaya kniga. (In Russ.)
18. Voytolovsky, L. (1909). Periodicals and book literature. Review of 1908: Supplement No. 1 to the Kievskaya Mysl newspaper, 1 Jan., p. 4. (In Russ.)
19. Weininger, O. (2012). Sex and character. An investigation of fundamental principles. Translated from German. Moscow: Academicheskiy Proekt. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Fedotova S.V. Gender inversion in the ‘critique of a critic’. Zinaida Gippius on Korney Chukovsky. Voprosy literatury. 2022;(1):163-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-1-163-178
Views:
239
Email this article 
