Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Small collectives in the context of M. Bakhtin’s philosophical paradigm

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-4-134-148

Abstract

The article studies the phenomenon of small collectives as a crucial institution of intellectual and cultural life. Examining the materials of the Nevel Circle and M. Bakhtin’s early works, the author shows how the atmosphere of trust and regular dialogues stimulated the development of moral philosophy and a polyphonic communication model. Ensuring the safety of discourse, small collectives help remove social and ideological barriers and prepare an idea for a serious dispute with opponents. The study cites public disputes in 1918–1919 involving the Bakhtin Circle as examples of such an approach. The theoretical underpinnings of the phenomenon link it to Bakhtin’s concepts of dialogue, event, and polyphony; he saw a collective as a form of organized coexistence of multiple voices, distinct from both cacophony and censorship. The study provides additional examples from the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics and offers Y. Lotman’s perspective on small collectives. The author argues that, as a practical method of preserving culture, developing humanitarian thinking, and overcoming ideological pressure, the tradition of small collectives deserves a prompt resurrection.

About the Author

A. V. Velikorod
Independent Researcher
Russian Federation

Arseny V. Velikorod, Independent Researcher,

10, Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Ln., Moscow, 125375.



References

1. Bakhtin, M. (1997). Collected works (7 vols). Vol. 5. Ed. by S. Bocharov and L. Gogotishvili. Moscow: Russkie slovari. (In Russ.)

2. Bakhtin, M. (2000). Collected works (7 vols). Vol. 2. Ed. by S. Bocharov and L. Melikhova. Moscow: Russkie slovari. (In Russ.)

3. Bakhtin, M. (2003). Collected works (7 vols). Vol. 1. Ed. by S. Bocharov and N. Nikolaev. Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)

4. From the editorial board (preface to 25th issue of “Sign System Studies”). (1994). In: A. Koshelev, ed., Y. M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics. Moscow: Gnozis, pp. 502-503. (In Russ.)

5. Goryaeva, T. (2002). Political censorship in the USSR, 1917-1991. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

6. Ivanov, Vyach. (1994). From the next century. In: A. Koshelev, ed., Y. M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics. Moscow: Gnozis, pp. 486-490. (In Russ.)

7. Laptun, V. (2021). Nevel. Bakhtinskiy Vestnik, 3(1), pp. 52-54. (In Russ.)

8. Likhachev, D. (1991). I remember. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

9. Likhachev, D. (1993). On Russian intelligentsia. Noviy Mir , 2, pp. 3-9. (In Russ.)

10. Lotman, Y. (1988). Conversations on Russian culture. Episode 14: Clubs and societies. [online] VK. Available at: https://vkvideo.ru/video-62783534_170762421?pl=-62783534_55864788 [Accessed 15 Apr. 2025]. (In Russ.)

11. Lotman, Y. (1994). Notes on Tartu periodicals on semiotics. In: A. Koshelev, ed., Y. M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics. Moscow: Gnozis, pp. 497-501. (In Russ.)

12. Makhlin, V. (2001). The Nevel School. The Bakhtin Circle. In: K. Isupov, ed., M. Bakhtin. Pro et contra (2 vols). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: RKhGA, pp. 122-135. (In Russ.)

13. Nikolaev, N. (1996). M. Bakhtin in Nevel in the summer of 1919. In: L. Maksimovskaya, ed., Nevel collection. Issue 1. St. Petersburg: Akropol, pp. 96-101. (In Russ.)

14. Shatskikh, A. (2001). Vitebsk. Life of art. 1917-1922 . Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Velikorod A.V. Small collectives in the context of M. Bakhtin’s philosophical paradigm. Voprosy literatury. 2026;(4):134-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-4-134-148

Views: 27

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)