Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

“In the end, the sun remains…” Ksenia Nekrasova’s artistic world

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-3-97-111

Abstract

The paper considers the characteristics of the verse penned by the Russian poet Ksenia Nekrasova (1912–1958) that define the unique artistic world of her poetry. The scholars devote special attention to the role of the visual nature of her poems and the principal differences between ‘verbal painting’ and visual representations as such. In addition, the study analyzes the characteristic features of subjective organization and the personification devices that feature in Nekrasova’s texts as a form of man’s harmony with immediate environment. The study suggests that, along with the remarkable characteristics of her poetry, including a syncretic worldview, a spontaneity of poetics, and heteromorphic verse, Nekrasova’s oeuvre remains compelling due to the fact that words are predominantly a means, and not the subject of, depiction. Hence a common, though misguided, perception that her poems are ‘badly made’ and lack skill. Nekrasova’s poetic world is what we see, observe, and reflect upon.

About the Authors

E. A. Balashova
K. E. Tsiolkovsky Kaluga State University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Balashova, Doctor of Philology

4 Voznesensky Ln., Kaluga, 248000



I. A. Kargashin
Independent researcher
Russian Federation

Igor A. Kargashin, Doctor of Philology

10 Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Ln., Moscow, 125375



References

1. Andreeva, A. and Orlitsky, Y. (2009). Heteromorphic (unordered) verse in Russian poetry. In: A. Prokhorov and T. Skulacheva, eds., Slavic verse. VIII: Verse, language, meaning. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 365-389. (Studia poetica.) (In Russ.)

2. Dahl, V. (1981). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language (4 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. (In Russ.)

3. Davydov, D. (2023). Ksenia Nekrasova: on the specifics of her artistic behaviour and cultural myth. Mezhdunarodniy Zhurnal Issledovaniy Kultury, 3, pp. 46-57. (In Russ.)

4. Davydov, D. (2024). On the specifics of Ksenia Nekrasova’s literary identity and lyrical subject. In: V. Malkina, ed., Subjective structure of lyric poetry: A collective monograph. Moscow: Editus, pp. 142-152. (In Russ.)

5. Grishchenko, A. and Nikolina, N. (2006). Expressive ethnonyms as signs of hate speech. In: I. Vepreva, N. Kupina and O. Mikhaylova, eds., Hate speech and consent speech in the socio-cultural context of modernity: A collective monograph. Yekaterinburg: Uralskiy un-t, pp. 175-187. (In Russ.)

6. Kargashin, I. (2015). On the typology of subject structure in the lyrics of Osip Mandelstam. Noviy Filologicheskiy Vestnik, 1, pp. 68-75. (In Russ.)

7. Orlitsky, Y. (2013). On the nature of Ksenia Nekrasova’s verse. In: E. Sozina, ed., Literature and history as the facets of the one (on the problem of interdisciplinary connections). Issue 7. Vol. 2. Yekaterinburg: Uralskiy un-t, pp. 27-35. (In Russ.)

8. Ozhegov, S. (1982). Dictionary of the Russian language: Approx. 57,000 words. Ed. by Prof. N. Shvedova. 14th ed. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. (In Russ.)

9. Tynyanov, Y. (1977). Illustrations. In: Y. Tynyanov, Poetics. History of Literature. Cinema. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 310-318. (In Russ.)

10. Zhitenyov, A. (2021). Modern concepts of ekphrasis and the epistemological model of ekphrastic text. Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 2, pp. 28-34. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Balashova E.A., Kargashin I.A. “In the end, the sun remains…” Ksenia Nekrasova’s artistic world. Voprosy literatury. 2026;(3):97-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2026-3-97-111

Views: 22

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)