

‘Night’s as murky as the skies’. ‘The literary today’ and history of literature as discursive problems
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-4-13-35
Abstract
The article explores the principal new situation that has emerged in the ‘literary field’ (P. Bourdieu). The authors suggest that, in their discussions, literary scholars have largely overlooked persistent ideological and discursive conflicts as well as the figure of a ‘Kulturträger’ scholar of the humanities as such. The entire field is experiencing an implacable discursive conflict: having global origins, it poses a challenge to national histories, including histories of literature. The discursive and civic creed of the liberal scholarly and artistic elite developed for fifty years, its current makeup defined by complete rejection of the concept of ‘Russia’ and the Russian intelligentsia’s entire traditional legacy, including the core concept of ‘narod’ (common people). The authors argue that fascination with the Western liberal political discourse, when it reaches the intensity of a ‘political religion,’ combined with total alienation from all things national, spells self-inflicted doom for those elites and renders any dialogue impossible, while the prevalence of political consciousness within the ‘framework rules’ of the literary domain bankrupts culture.
About the Authors
D. I. IvanovChina
Dmitry I. Ivanov, Candidate of Philology
18 East Section, Electronic Second Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710065
D. L. Lakerbay
Russian Federation
Dmitry L. Lakerbay, Candidate of Philology
57 1st Rayonnaya St., Ivanovo, 153021
References
1. Arkhangelsky, A. (2022). Call evil by its name. In: N. Plotnikov, ed., In the face of catastrophe: Collected papers. Berlin: LIT Verlag, pp. 19-26. (In Russ.)
2. Asmolov, A. (2014). The historical meaning of the crisis of cultural-activity psychology. Mir Psikhologii, 3, pp. 17-33. (In Russ.)
3. Basinsky, P. (2023). We should honour our Russian talents, even if we aren’t ideologically aligned. Rossiyskaia Gazeta, [online] 1 Oct. Available at: https://rg.ru/2023/10/01/davajte-govorit.html [Accessed 20 Apr. 2024]. (In Russ.)
4. Belinsky, V. (1982). The countryside reading. In: A. Volodin, ed., Utopian socialism: An anthology. Moscow: Politizdat, pp. 378-380. (In Russ.)
5. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The literary field. Translated by F. Gronas. In: P. Bourdieu, Social space: Fields and practices. Moscow: Institut eksperimentalnoy sotsiologii; St. Petersburg: Aleteya, pp. 265-372. (In Russ.)
6. Casey, M. (2022). Decolonize Russia. To avoid more senseless bloodshed, the Kremlin must lose what empire it still retains. The Atlantic, [online] 27 May.Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/russia-putin-colonization-ukraine-chechnya /639428/ [Accessed 20 Apr. 2024].
7. Dobrenko, E. (1993). Metaphor of power. Literature of the Stalin era in historical context. München: Sagner. (In Russ.)
8. Epstein, M. (2015). The irony of the ideal. Paradoxes of Russian literature. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)
9. Lekmanov, O. and Sverdlov, M. (2011). Sergey Esenin: A biography. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Moscow: Astrel: CORPUS. (In Russ.)
10. Lotman, M. (2022). A singer of the empire against the backdrop of Bucha. Putin’s war and Joseph Brodsky. Radio Svoboda, [online] 12 Oct. Available at: t.me/radiosvoboda/29789 [Accessed 22 Apr. 2024]. (In Russ.)
11. Lotman, Y. (1989). Pushkin. In: I. Terteryan, ed., History of world literature (9 vols). Vol. 6. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 321-338. (In Russ.)
12. Lotman, Y. (2010). The semiosphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB. (In Russ.)
13. Montefiore, S. S. (2023). The decolonization narrative is dangerous and false. The Atlantic, [online] 27 Oct. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/search/?q=The+Decolonization+Narrative+Is+Danderous/ [Accessed 20 Apr. 2024].
14. Morev, G. (2020). The Poet and the Tsar. From the history of Russian cultural mythology (Mandelstam, Pasternak, Brodsky). Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo. (In Russ.)
15. Pelipenko, A. and Yakovenko, I. (1998). Culture as a system. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury. (In Russ.)
16. Petrovskaya, E. (2014). Pussy Riot: From intervention to action. In: O. Aronson and E. Petrovskaya, What remains of art. Moscow: Institut problem sovremennogo iskusstva, pp. 118-136. (In Russ.)
17. Petrovskaya, E. (2022). Empire; or, Self-expanding void. In: N. Plotnikov, ed., In the face of catastrophe: Collected papers. Berlin: LIT Verlag, pp. 93-102. (In Russ.)
18. Plotnikov, N. (2022). Foreword. In: N. Plotnikov, ed., In the face of catastrophe: Collected papers. Berlin: LIT Verlag, pp. 5-12. (In Russ.)
19. Yakovenko, I. (2011). Russia and repression: A repressive component of Russian culture. Moscow: Noviy khronograf. (In Russ.)
20. Yakovenko, I. (2014). Russia and modernization in the 1990s and afterwards: The socio-cultural dimension. Moscow: Novye Znaniya. (In Russ.)
21. Zholkovsky, A. (1994). On genius, villainy, a stupid hag, and the all-Russian scale (Deconstructing Mayakovsky). In: A. Zholkovsky, Wandering dreams and other studies. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 247-275. (In Russ.)
22. Zorin, A. (2024). Pushkin and the phenomenon of national genius. Rodnoe Slovo, [online] 10 Feb. Available at: https://souzpisatel.ru/andrej-zorin-pushkin-i-fenomen-nacionalnogo-geniya/ [Accessed 20 Apr. 2024]. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ivanov D.I., Lakerbay D.L. ‘Night’s as murky as the skies’. ‘The literary today’ and history of literature as discursive problems. Voprosy literatury. 2024;(4):13-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-4-13-35