|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Did Pushkin write a review of Baumeister’s Metaphysics?
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-3-39-59
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the authorship attribution of the anonymous review published in Literaturnaya Gazeta on 2 March 1830 in response to a revised edition of the Russian translation of F. C. Baumeister’s Metaphysics [Institutiones Metaphysicae]. The hypothesis that names the author as A. Delvig (V. Vinogradov, S. Kibalnik) is criticized for its lack of proof. The scholar argues in favour of Pushkin’s authorship. The review is considered in the context of Pushkin’s ‘indirect polemic’ with the book’s translator Y. Tolmachev, a prominent figure of the Russian national education system in the 1810s–1820s. Pushkin’s possible authorship is revealed in the stylistic features of the review as well as parallels between the poet’s own works (A Scene from ‘Faust’ [Stsena iz Fausta], Mozart and Salieri [Motsart i Salieri], and the so-called ‘Objections to Küchelbecker’s articles published in Mnemozina’ [‘Vozrazheniya na statyi Kyukhelbekera v Mnemozine’]) and selected paragraphs from Baumeister’s Metaphysics. Nearly all those texts relate to the period of Pushkin’s exile to his Mikhaylovskoe estate, when the poet had the opportunity to familiarize himself with Baumeister’s book.
About the Author
E. V. Abdullaev
Tashkent Orthodox Theological Seminary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Abdullaev, Candidate of Philosophy
91 Avlieot St., Tashkent, 100015
References
1. Abdullaev, E. (2021). ‘One bearded sage concluded: there’s no motion.’ Pushkin’s ‘philosophical epigram’ and a dispute about hexameter. Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 148-169. (In Russ.)
2. Abramov, A. (2001). Christian Wolff in Russian spiritual and academic philosophy. In: V. Zhuchkov, ed., Christian Wolff and philosophy in Russia. St. Petersburg: RKhGI, pp. 189-209. (In Russ.)
3. <Baumeister, C.> (1830). Metaphysics of C. Baumeister translated from Latin by Y. Tolmachev. 2nd revised ed. St. Petersburg: Tip. Meditsin. depart. Min. vnutr. del. (In Russ.)
4. Gin, Y. (1993). From the comments on ‘Eugene Onegin’: Agafon. In: D. Likhachev, V. Vatsuro and S. Fomichev, eds., The Pushkin Commission Chronicle. Issue 25. St. Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 135-143. (In Russ.)
5. Gorky, M., Blagoy, D., Bondi S. et al., eds. (1937-1959). The complete works of A. Pushkin (16 vols). Moscow, Leningrad: AN SSSR. (In Russ.)
6. Grigoriev, V. (1870). The Imperial St. Petersburg University during the first fifty years of its existence. St. Petersburg: V. Bezobrazov i Komp. (In Russ.)
7. Fortunatov, F. (1869). Reminiscences of St. Petersburg University in 1830-1833. Russkiy Arkhiv, 2, pp. 305-340. (In Russ.)
8. Jondot, É. (1807). Cours d’histoire. Journal de l’Empire, 15 Oct., pp. 3-4. (In French).
9. Jondot, É. (1808). Tableau historique des nations, ou rapprochement des principaux évènemens arrivés à la même époque sur la surface de la terre (4 vols). Vol. 4. Paris: Mardan. (In French).
10. Khozyainov, S. (2007). The problem of authorship of social and political essays attributed to A. S. Pushkin: Content and research methods. Vestnik SPbGU. Language and Literature Series, 3-4, pp. 274-280. (In Russ.)
11. Khozyainov, S. (2008). Attribution of publicistic works attributed to A. S. Pushkin: Texts of 1830-1836. Thesis abstract. Candidate of Philology. St. Petersburg State University. (In Russ.)
12. Kibalnik, S. (2012). Classical poetry in Russia. 18th c. — the first half of the 19th c. Essays. St. Petersburg: ID ‘Petropolis.’ (In Russ.)
13. Kiesewetter, J. G. K. (1829). Logic for the use of studen ts. Translated by Y. Tolmachev. St. Petersburg: Tip. Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk. (In Russ.)
14. Klyuchevsky, V. (1968). Letters. Diaries. Aphorisms and thoughts about history. Ed. by R. Kireev and A. Zimin. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
15. Krasnoborodko, T. and Khitrova, D. (2008). Pushkin’s objection to Küchelbecker, a draft. In: A. Dolinin, L. Fleishman and L. Livak, eds., Russian literature and the West. A tribute to David M. Bethea. Part 1. Stanford: Stanford University, pp. 66-116. (In Russ.)
16. Kruglov, A. (2012). Kant and Kantian philosophy in Russian fiction. Moscow: ‘Kanon+’ ROOI ‘Reabilitatsiya.’ (In Russ.)
17. Küchelbecker, V. (2021). Lyceum dictionary. Ed. by Е. Abdullaev. St. Petersburg: Rostok. (In Russ.)
18. Literaturnaya Gazeta. (1830). 2 Mar. (In Russ.)
19. Mendelssohn, M. (1806). A treatise on the incorporeality of the human soul. Translated by <Y. Tolmachev> at the Kharkov Collegium. Moscow: Tip. S. Selivanovskogo. (In Russ.)
20. Modzalevsky, B. (1910). <A. S. Pushkin’s library>. In: B. Tomashevsky, ed., Pushkin and his contemporaries: Materials and research. Issue 9/10. St. Petersburg: Tip. Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk, pp. I-XIX. (In Russ.)
21. Moskovskiy Telegraf. (1830). Part 31. (In Russ.)
22. Odoevsky, V. (1975). Russian nights [Russkie nochi]. Ed. by B. Egorov, E. Maymin and M. Medovoy. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)
23. Panaev, I. (1988). Literary memoirs. Ed. by I. Yampolsky. Moscow: Pravda. (In Russ.)
24. Pliny the Younger. (1820). Panegyric in praise of Trajan. Translated by Y. Tolmachev. St. Petersburg: Tip. Grecha. (In Russ.)
25. Styopina, S. [n. d.] The Junior Delvig Circle in the history of Russian poetry of the 1830s. [online] Available at: https://pushkinskijdom.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Styopina-2015-1.pdf [Accessed 1 Dec. 2023]. (In Russ.)
26. Stolpyansky, P. (1927). Pushkin and Severnaya Pchela (1825-1837): Continued. In: Pushkin and his contemporaries: Materials and research. Issue 31/32. Leningrad: AN SSSR, pp. 129-146. (In Russ.)
27. Tolmachev, Y. (1805). Russian poetry for the youth studying at the Kharkiv Collegium. Moscow: Tip. S. Selivanovskogo. (In Russ.)
28. Tolmachev, Y. (1815-1822). The rules of literature: From the fundamentals to the heights of eloquence (4 parts). St. Petersburg: Morskaya tip. (In Russ.)
29. Tolmachev, Y. (1818). Cicero’s speech for Archias. Zhurnal Drevney I Novoy Slovesnosti, 1, pp. 3-24. (In Russ.)
30. Tolmachev, Y. (1820). A brief review of the literature of ancient peoples. St. Petersburg: Tip. Vospitatelnogo doma. (In Russ.)
31. Tolmachev, Y. (1825). Military eloquence based on the general principles of literature, with the examples of different types thereof (3 parts). St. Petersburg: Tip. Meditsin. depart. Min. vnutr. del. (In Russ.)
32. <Tolmachev, Y.> (1892). Yakov Vasilievich Tolmachev, professor ordinarius at St. Petersburg University. An autobiographical note. Russkaya Starina, books 7-9, pp. 699-724. (In Russ.)
33. Vatsuro, V., ed. (1986). The works of A. Delvig: Poems; Articles; Letters. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)
34. Vinogradov, V. (1939). Pushkin’s unknown notes in Literaturnaya Gazeta of 1830. In: V. Bonch-Bruevich, B. Meylakh, A. Orlov et al., eds., Pushkin: The Pushkin Commission Chronicle. <Issue> 4/5. Moscow, Leningrad: AN SSSR, pp. 453-476. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Abdullaev E.V. Did Pushkin write a review of Baumeister’s Metaphysics? Voprosy literatury. 2024;(3):39-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-3-39-59
Views:
107
Email this article 
