CHEKHOV AS BAZAROV THE WORLDVIEW AND AESTHETIC ASPECTS OF TURGENEV’S TRADITION
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-3-218-258
Abstract
The article undertakes to reveal the aesthetic and philosophical succession from Turgenev to Chekhov, despite the long-standing tendency to contrast the latter with the tradition of his predecessors.
The article suggests a polemic rethinking of the literary, philosophical and culturological concepts that present the thinker and artist Turgenev as a keen advocate of classical philosophy. In particular, the paper examines the worldviews and personality of Evgeny Bazarov, one of Turgenev’s principal characters, also in comparison with Chekhov’s heroes like the professor from A Dreary Story [Skuchnaya istoriya] and Doctor Astrov. This leads to a considerable change in interpretation of Bazarov’s nihilism to discover not only an ideology, but rather a methodology of non-dogmatic thinking and a critical approach to reality. In this sense, Bazarov’s (and, essentially, Turgenev’s) nihilism is considered as the philosophical basis of what later became Chekhov’s ‘creation ex nihilo’ (L. Shestov).
The analysis presented in this paper brings to light Chekhov’s and Turgenev’s principal philosophical affinity and semblance of their cultural and aesthetic perspectives.
About the Author
G. Rebel
Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina M. Rebel, Doctor of Philology
24 Sibirskaya St., Perm, 614990
References
1. Alekseev, M., ed. (1960-1968). The complete works of I. Turgenev (28 vols). Letters (13 vols). Moscow, St. Petersburg: AN SSSR. (In Russ.)
2. Batyuto, A. (1972). Turgenev as a novelist. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
3. Belchikov, N., ed. (1974-1983). The complete works and letters of A. Chekhov (30 vols). Letters (12 vols). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
4. Dolzhenkov, P. (2003). Chekhov and positivism. Moscow: Skorpion. (In Russ.)
5. Goldenweiser, А. (2002). Near Tolstoy: Memoirs. Moscow: Zakharov. (In Russ.)
6. Gromov, M. (1976). Commentary. In: N. Belchikov, ed., The complete works and letters of A. Chekhov (30 vols). Letters (12 vols). Vol. 4. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 453-522. (In Russ.)
7. Hertsen, А. (2010). Bazarov again. In: V. Kantor, ed., The selected works of A. Hertsen. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 681-694. (In Russ.)
8. Ivanov-Razumnik, R. (1910). On the meaning of life: F. Sologub, L. Andreev and L. Shestov. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Printing office of М. М. Stasyulevich. (In Russ.)
9. Merezhkovsky, D. (1986). A newly-born talent facing the same old question. In: A. Chekhov, In the twilight: Sketches and stories. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 330-372. (In Russ.)
10. Mikhaylovsky, N. (1957). On fathers and sons and Mr. Chekhov. In: N. Mikhaylovsky, Literary criticism. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 594-607. (In Russ.)
11. Mikhaylovsky, N. (1995). From the literary and journal articles of 1874. In: N. Mikhaylovsky, Literary criticism and memoirs. Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 91-98. (In Russ.)
12. Nevedomsky, M. (2002). Wingless. Chekhov and his work. In: I. Sukhikh, ed., A. P. Chekhov: Pro et contra: Russian thinkers of the late 19th – early 20th centuries on the work of А. P. Chekhov (1887-1914): An anthology. St. Petersburg: RKhGI, pp. 786-830. (In Russ.)
13. Nikolsky, Y. (1921). Turgenev and Dostoevsky (A story of a feud). Sofia: Russian-Bulgarian publishing house. (In Russ.)
14. Odesskaya, M. (2011). Chekhov and the problem of the ideal (Changing the ethical-aesthetic paradigm at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries). PhD. Lomonosov Moscow State University. (In Russ.)
15. Popper, K. (1995). What is dialectic? Translated by G. Novichkova. Voprosy Filosofii, 1, pp. 118-138. (In Russ.)
16. Porus, V. (2014). Existence and melancholy: А. P. Chekhov and A. P. Platonov. Voprosy Filosofii, 1, pp. 19-33. (In Russ.)
17. Rebel, G. (2012). Chekhov’s variations of ‘Turgenev’s girl’ type. Russkaya Literatura, 2, pp. 144-170. (In Russ.)
18. Saltykov-Shchedrin, М. (1859). From the letter to P. V. Annenkov to Petersburg dtd. 3 Feb. 1859. In: K. Bonetsky, ed., Turgenev in Russian criticism: Collected papers. Moscow: GIKhL, 1953, pp. 397-399. (In Russ.)
19. Shestov, L. (1982). Turgenev. Ann Arbor>: Ardis. (In Russ.)
20. Shestov, L. (2010). Creation ex nihilo. In: E. Petrenko, ed., The selected works of L. Shestov (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 20-52. (In Russ.)
21. Stirner, М. (1994). The Ego and Its Own. Translated by B. Himmelfarb, М. Hochschiller. Kharkiv: Osnova. (In Russ.)
22. Time, G. (2011). Russia and Germany: Philosophical discourse in Russian literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)
23. Tolstoy, L. (1884). Letter to A. N. Pypin dtd. 10 Jan. 1884. In: V. Chertkov, ed., The complete works of L. Tolstoy (90 vols). Vol. 63. Moscow, St. Petersburg: GIKhL, 1934, pp. 149-150. (In Russ.)
24. Zenkovsky, V. (1997). World outlook of I. S. Turgenev: In honour of the 75th death anniversary. In: V. Zenkovsky, Russian thinkers and Europe. Moscow: Respublika, pp. 287-300. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rebel G. CHEKHOV AS BAZAROV THE WORLDVIEW AND AESTHETIC ASPECTS OF TURGENEV’S TRADITION. Voprosy literatury. 2018;(3):218-258. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-3-218-258
Views:
589
Email this article 
