Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Three Werthers over the precipice. Goethe allusions in Goncharov’s novel

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-3-16-44

Abstract

The article discovers an allusion to Goethe’s Werther in Goncharov’s The Precipice [Obryv] and explains its role in the novel. The author notices how the book’s leading male characters — Boris Raysky, Mark Volokhov, and Tit Nikonych Vatutin — exhibit the intertextual markers. The triple allusion to Goethe’s protagonist is examined as a key to understanding the novelist’s aesthetic testimony of the diversity of the forms of life, which calls for adequate, i. e., flexible, artistic representation. The author proposes and goes on to justify a hypothesis that The Precipice should be treated as a juxtaposition of two novelistic models. The article uncovers the supposed discrepancy between Goncharov’s own artistic method and the one perceived through his character Boris Raysky’s literary experiments. While Goncharov abandons the linear and monolithic nature of artistic structures, Raysky (if only subconsciously at times) prefers his characters and plots to be well-rounded and complete. The scholar finds that, through an ingenious use of the complex structure of a novel-within-a-novel, Goncharov on behalf of his hero invokes the classical paradigm of the 1800s — 1850s novel, only to deconstruct it in his own work.

About the Author

S. K. Kazakova
Independent researcher
Russian Federation

Svetlana K. Kazakova Candidate of Art History, independent researcher

43 Sivtsev Vrazhek Ln., Rm. 417, Moscow, 119002



References

1. Annenkov, P. (1982). On thought in belles-lettres. In: V. Kantor and A. Ospovat, eds., Russian aesthetics and criticism of the 40s — 50s of the 19th c. Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 319-344. (In Russ.)

2. Balashova, E. (2003). Literary works of I. A. Goncharov’s protagonists. In: I. А. Goncharov: Proceedings of the International conference marking I. A. Goncharov’s 190th birth anniversary. Ulyanovsk: Korporatsiya tekhnologiy prodvizheniya, pp. 179-185. (In Russ.)

3. Bakhtin, M. (1970). Epic and novel (Toward a methodology for the study of the novel). Voprosy Literatury, 1, pp. 95-122. (In Russ.)

4. Bakhtin, M. (2012). The novel as a literary genre. In: S. Bocharov and V. Kozhinov, eds., The collected works of M. Bakhtin (7 vols). Vol. 3. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 608-654. (In Russ.)

5. Brochhaus, F. and Efron, I., eds. (1897). Brockhaus and Efron encyclopaedic dictionary (80 vols). Vol. 20a. St. Petersburg: Semyonovskaya tipolitografiya. (In Russ.)

6. Cheryukina, G. (2008). ‘The gift of being human’: I. A. Goncharov’s novel ‘The Precipice’ [‘Obryv’] as a study in artistic anthropology. In: I. A. Goncharov: Proceedings of the International conference marking I. A. Goncharov’s 195th birth anniversary. Ulyanovsk: Korporatsiya tekhnologiy prodvizheniya, pp. 177-184. (In Russ.)

7. Dobrolyubov, N. (1958). What is Oblomovism? In: M. Polyakov and S. Trubnikov, eds., I. А. Goncharov in Russian literary criticism. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 53-93. (In Russ.)

8. Edelson, E. (1982). A few words about the current state and role of aesthetic criticism in our country. In: V. Kantor and A. Ospovat, eds., Russian aesthetics and criticism of the 40s — 50s of the 19th c. Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 250-283. (In Russ.)

9. Geyro, L. (1980). Commentary to the novel ‘The Precipice’ [‘Obryv’]. In: I. Goncharov, The precipice [Obryv]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, pp. 704-717. (In Russ.)

10. Goncharov, I. (1955a.). ‘A million torments’ (a critical essay). In: А. Rybasov, ed., The collected works of I. Goncharov (8 vols). Vol. 8. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 7-40. (In Russ.)

11. Goncharov, I. (1955b). Preface to the novel ‘The Precipice’ [‘Obryv’]. In: А. Rybasov, ed., The collected works of I. Goncharov (8 vols). Vol. 8. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 141-169. (In Russ.)

12. Kazakova, S. (2015). The protagonists of Goncharov’s novel ‘The Precipice’ [‘Obryv’] in the context of Russia’s economic history. Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 59-76. (In Russ.)

13. Kazakova, S. (2018). A common case: A ‘dialogue’ between Goncharov and Scribe. Voprosy Literatury, 4, pp. 286-300. (In Russ.)

14. Kazakova, S. (2019). Mysterious Cordelia: Who was it that Ilya Oblomov saw in his dreams? Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 161-182. (In Russ.)

15. Khaynadi, Z. (2010). Oblomov as Anti-Faust. Voprosy Literatury, 4, pp. 360-384. (In Russ.)

16. Krasnoshchekova, E. (2003). I. A. Goncharov: Bildungsroman on Russian soil. In: I. А. Goncharov: Proceedings of the International conference marking I. A. Goncharov’s 190th birth anniversary. Ulyanovsk: Korporatsiya tekhnologiy prodvizheniya, pp. 7-19. (In Russ.)

17. Krasnoshchekova, E. (2012). I. А. Goncharov: His artistic world. St. Petersburg: Izd. Pushkinskogo fonda. (In Russ.)

18. Künstlerroman. (1998). Encyclopedia Britannica, [online] 20 July. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/art/Kunstlerroman [Accessed 15 Sept. 2021].

19. Mazzoni, G. (2017). Theory of the novel. Translated by Z. Hanafi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. P.

20. Molnar, A. (2012). The poetry of prose in Goncharov’s works. Ulyanovsk: Korporatsiya tekhnologiy prodvizheniya. (In Russ.)

21. Nedzvetsky, V. (1992). I. А. Goncharov as a novelist and artist. Moscow: MGU. (In Russ.)

22. Otradin, M. (1994). I. A. Goncharov’s prose in the literary context. St. Petersburg: SPbGU. (In Russ.)

23. Pushkin, A. (1962). Table-talk. In: D. Blagoy et al., eds., The collected works of A. Pushkin (10 vols). Vol. 7. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 206-222. (In Russ.)

24. Saltykov-Shchedrin, M. (1958). Street philosophy. In: M. Polyakov and S. Trubnikov, eds., I. А. Goncharov in Russian literary criticism. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 196-234. (In Russ.)

25. Schlegel, F. (1983). The works of Goethe. Translated by Y. Popov. In: Y. Popov, ed., The aesthetics, philosophy, and criticism of F. Schlegel (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Iskusstvo, pp. 274-288. (In Russ.)

26. Shelgunov, N. (1958). Talented mediocrity. In: M. Polyakov and S. Trubnikov, eds., I. А. Goncharov in Russian literary criticism. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 235-276. (In Russ.)

27. Skabichevsky, A. (1958). The old truth. In: M. Polyakov and S. Trubnikov, eds., I. А. Goncharov in Russian literary criticism. Moscow: GIKhL, pp. 277-328. (In Russ.)

28. Vodovozova, E. (1987). At the dawn of life (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kazakova S.K. Three Werthers over the precipice. Goethe allusions in Goncharov’s novel. Voprosy literatury. 2022;(3):16-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-3-16-44

Views: 168


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)