Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A self-destructing narration. The egocentricity of language, transcendence of poetry, and psychoanalysis in P. J. Jouve’s novel Hecate

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-6-136-157

Abstract

Hitherto untranslated into Russian, P. J. Jouve’s Hecate (1928) not only interprets myths about the mysterious Greek goddess, doing it in the guise of a love-and-crime chronicle, but also represents the author’s unique attempt to construct a work of fiction on the principle of permanent self-destruction. Y. Muratov sets out to examine the novel’s plot and structure in the first study of its kind. According to the scholar, Jouve, in full adherence to modernist laws and simultaneously experimenting with them, purposely destroys his narrative, turning the destruction into a method: just as the characters in Hecate cannot be sure who they are and try to see themselves in other people’s reflections, the reader is deprived of the means to tell who they are reading about — neither quotation marks, nor the dialogue form, nor context offer any point of reference. Interestingly, Jouve does not play with grammatical person in order to shift the viewpoint of the narration, as in ordinary narrative practice, but to dismantle classical narration and immerse it in the process of creation, luring the reader into a kind of Plato’s cave of linguistically symbolical metafiction.

About the Author

Yu. M. Muratov

Russian Federation

Yury M. Muratov, Candidate of Philology

10 Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Ln., Moscow, 125009



References

1. Benveniste, E. (1974). General linguistics. Translated by Y. Stepanov. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

2. Bonhomme, B. (1996). Les jeux de l’écriture dans l’œuvre de Pierre Jean Jouve. In: C. Blot-Labarrère, ed., Jouve et les jeux de l’écriture 1. Paris: Minard, pp. 125-155. (In French).

3. Castelein, M. (2017). Hécate dans l’œuvre romanesque de Pierre Jean Jouve. L’Entre¬deux, [online] 1(2), décembre. Available at: https://www.lentre-deux.com/?b=17 [Accessed 19 Aug. 2021]. (In French).

4. Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent minds: Narrative models for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton U. P.

5. Collin, M. (1978). Desir et raison. Paris: Hatier. (In French).

6. Gelas, B. (2011). Là où la fiction défaille… Idéal, déception, fictions: Annuel de l’APF, 1, pp. 140-165. (In French).

7. Graves, R. (2002). Les Mythes grecs. Paris: Le Livre de Poche. (In French).

8. Kerényi, K. (1951). La jeune fille divine. In: C. G. Jung et K. Kerényi, ed., Introduction à l’essence de la mythologie. Paris: Payot. (In French).

9. Lacan, J. (1998). Seminars. Book 1: Freud’s papers on technique (1953–54). Translated by M. Titova. Moscow: Gnozis. (In Russ.)

10. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’Invisible. Paris: Gallimard. (In French).

11. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976). Phénomélogie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard. (In French).

12. Paducheva, E. (2011). Egocentric valencies and deconstruction of the speaker. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, 3, pp. 3-18. (In Russ.)

13. Ricœur, P. (1997). La Métaphore vive. Paris: Le Seuil. (In French).

14. Spretnak, C. (1978). Lost goddess of early Greece: A collection of pre-Hellenic myths. Boston: Beacon Press.

15. Whorf, B. L. (1960). The relation of habitual thought and behaviour to language. Translated by L. Patan and E. Turkova. In: V. Zvegintsev, ed., New developments in linguistics. Issue 1. Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura, pp. 135-168. (In Russ.)

16. Žižek, S. (1999). The sublime object of ideology. Translated by V. Sofronov. Moscow: Khudozhestvenniy zhurnal. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Muratov Yu.M. A self-destructing narration. The egocentricity of language, transcendence of poetry, and psychoanalysis in P. J. Jouve’s novel Hecate. Voprosy literatury. 2021;(6):136-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-6-136-157

Views: 141


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)