Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Shakespeare between Copperfield and Micawber. On the function of Shakespeare’s words in David Copperfield

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-6-117-135

Abstract

The article explores the function of Shakespeare’s words as quoted by two characters of David Copperfield — David and Micawber. Each showing excellent memory of Shakespeare’s works, the two heroes embody opposing borrowing strategies. Whereas David carefully judges if the narrated subject matches a Shakespearean quote in its semantic and expressive power and may choose to adapt or altogether reject it upon reflection, Micawber borrows from Shakespeare almost unconsciously, at the same time showing a particular weakness for the most memorable and tragic lines. This inapt quoting oſten reduces Micawber to a bombastic thespian. The characters’ dialogue with Shakespeare is, in turn, one in which Dickens, famously fond of his great predecessor, is engaged himself through his novel. It appears, therefore, that the Shakespearean field brings the author closer to his characters. The novel’s references to Shakespeare’s plays which are analysed in this article were mentioned in V. Gager’s catalogue, yet remained hitherto unexplored in the comparative context and with regard to the novel.

About the Author

E. A. Shevchenko
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Elizaveta A. Shevchenko, Master of Philology

6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Bakhtin, M. (1975). Problems of literature and aesthetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)

2. Chekalov, I. (1993). Shakespeare in ‘Little Dorrit.’ In: A. Bartoshevich, ed., Shakespeare readings. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 207-226. (In Russ.)

3. Flissner, R. F. (1965). Dickens and Shakespeare: A study in histrionic contrasts. New York: Haskell House.

4. Forster, J. (1873). The life of Charles Dickens (3 vols). Vol. 2. London: Chapman&Hall.

5. Gager, V. L. (2006). Shakespeare and Dickens. The dynamics of influence. New York: Cambridge U. P.

6. Hardy, B. (2008). Dickens and creativity. London: Continuum.

7. Kosikov, G., ed. (2004). The selected works of Y. Kristeva: Destruction of poetics. Translated by G. Kosikov and B. Narumov. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

8. Leavis, F. R. and Leavis, Q. D. (1970). Dickens. The novelist. New York: Pantheon Books.

9. Mikhaylov, A. (2008). Methods and styles of literature. Moscow: IMLI RAN im. A. M. Gorkogo. (In Russ.)

10. Poole, A. (2004). Shakespeare and the Victorians. London: Thomson Learning.

11. Sillars, S. (2014). Shakespeare and the Victorians. Oxford: Oxford U. P.


Review

For citations:


Shevchenko E.A. Shakespeare between Copperfield and Micawber. On the function of Shakespeare’s words in David Copperfield. Voprosy literatury. 2021;(6):117-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-6-117-135

Views: 149


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)