Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Why modern poetry could use more ‘red ink’

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-3-77-88

Abstract

The article offers to look at contemporary poetry from the viewpoint of an ‘ordinary reader,’ uninvolved in the literary process and unaffiliated with the notional ‘establishment.’ The author uses his position as a bystander, on the one hand, and a training that enables expert assessment (the author teaches Russian language and literature and holds a master’s degree in cognitive research), on the other, to examine the processes behind presentday literary awards and criticism of poetry. According to Smirnov, modern poetry and modern criticism both have disintegrated into separate segments within a common literary field. The continuous erosion of language norms and dilution of criteria have pushed contemporary art, and poetry in particular, away from the rules of the classical ontology. Thus, a text cannot be identified as pertaining to ‘poetry’ by such key characteristics as rhyme, rhythm, or use of figurative language. In this situation, the author pins his hopes on the institution of criticism: unless it engages in self-reflection in order to recognise the circumstances and phenomena behind its failures, constructive changes remain unlikely.

About the Author

A. E. Smirnov
Moscow State-Funded Comprehensive Educational Institution School No. 501
Russian Federation

Anatoly E. Smirnov - psychologist, philologist, Russian language and literature teacher.

6 Sevanskaya St., Moscow, 115516, Russian Federation.



References

1. It is better to have an award for critics than not to have it at all: critics are people too. A survey of the All-Russian Literary and Critical Award ‘Furious Vissarion.’ (2019). Volga, 9, pp. 110-145. (In Russ.)

2. Pogorelaya, E. (2017). Network poetry: How not to get lost in the mazes of bad verses and where to find the good ones. Mel, [online] 27 Jan. Available at: https://mel.fm/literatura/9203417-web_poetry [Accessed 20 Feb. 2021]. (In Russ.)

3. Sinayko, Y. (2019). Nominator’s cover letter. [online] Atd-premiya.ru: Arkady Dragomoshchenko Award. Available at: https://atd-premia.ru/2019/07/30/aleksandr-smirnov-2019/ [Accessed 20 Feb. 2021]. (In Russ.)

4. Sokolov, I. (2017). Nominator’s cover letter. [online] Atd-rpemiya.ru: Arkady Dragomoshchenko Award. Available at: https://atd-premia.ru/2017/09/26/aleksandr-smirnov/ [Accessed 20 Feb. 2021]. (In Russ.)

5. Zhizhek, S. (1999). The Sublime Object of Ideology. Translated by V. Sofronov. Moscow: Khudozhestvenniy zhurnal. (In Russ.)

6. Zhizhek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the Real. Translated by A. Smirnov. Moscow: Fond ‘Pragmatika kultury.’ (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Smirnov A.E. Why modern poetry could use more ‘red ink’. Voprosy literatury. 2021;(3):77-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-3-77-88

Views: 239


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)