Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The geography of difference in Pericles and Foure Prentises of London

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-2-237-256

Abstract

Both Shakespeare and George Wilkins's Pericles and Thomas Heywood's Foure Prentises of London are romances striking in geographical scope. Analysing the two plays principally through John Gillies's concept of ‘geography of difference,' this essay argues that the geography of difference in Foure Prentises of London enhances the crude ideology of Eurocentric and masculine hegemony, whereas Pericles aims at Pentapolis, the Greek city-state, not only physically and geographically, but also spiritually and epistemologically. In Pericles, geographical mobility subserves poetic geography, and poetic geography subsumes geographical mobility. On the other hand, in the larger contemporary contexts, geographical mobility interacts intricately with the aristocratic ideology. In terms of ideology Pericles is basically a conservative play despite its geographical mobility, while Foure Prentises of London responds more keenly to its era and glorifies the middling rank with an aristocratic ideology by means of geographical mobility. Shakespeare and Wilkins's and Heywood's dramatic practices illustrate the rich possibilities inherent in the genre of romance.

About the Author

T. Hao
Zhejiang University
China

Hao Tianhu - PhD.

866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058.



References

1. Brenner, R. (1993). Merchants and revolution: Commercial change, political conflict, and London's overseas traders, 1550-1653. Princeton: Princeton U. P.

2. Brown, A. (1962). Thomas Heywood's dramatic art. In: R. Hosley, ed., Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan drama in honor of Hardin Craig. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, pp. 327-339.

3. Burnett, M. T. (1987). Marlovian imitation and interpretation in Heywood's The Four Prentices of London. Cahiers Elisabethains, 32, pp. 75-78.

4. Chambers, E. K. (1951). The Elizabethan stage (4 vols). Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon.

5. Davis, R. (1961). England and the Mediterranean, 1570-1670. In: F. J. Fisher, ed., Essays in the economic and social history of Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., pp. 117-137.

6. DelVecchio, D. and Hammond, A., eds. (1998). Pericles, Prince of Tyre. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.

7. Gillies, J. (1994). Shakespeare and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.

8. Heywood, T. (1615). The Foure Prentices of London, with the Conquest of Jerusalem. London: [s. n.]

9. Jameson, F. (1981). The political unconscious, narrative as a socially symbolic art. Ithaca: Cornell U. P.

10. McLuskie, K. E. (1994). Dekker and Heywood. English dramatists. New York: St. Martin's Press.

11. Mullaney, S. (1988). ‘All that monarchs do': The obscured stages of authority in Pericles. In: S. Mullaney, The place of the stage: License, play, and power in Renaissance England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 135-151.

12. Nerlich, M. (1987). Ideology of adventure: Studies in modern consciousness, 1100-1750 (2 vols). Vol. 1. Translated by R. Crowley. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13. Saul, N. (1997). Richard II. New Haven: Yale U. P.

14. Velte, M. (1922). The bourgeois elements in the dramas of Thomas Heywood. Dissertation, Princeton University.

15. Weisgall, D. (2000). Reading a civilization through its ancient shards. New York Times, 19 Nov., p. 39, continued on p. 43.

16. Wentworth, M. (1986). Thomas Heywood: A reference guide. Boston: G. K. Hall.


Review

For citations:


Hao T. The geography of difference in Pericles and Foure Prentises of London. Voprosy literatury. 2021;(2):237-256. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-2-237-256

Views: 198


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)