Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Pirandello: a theory and practice of «humorism»

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-2-203-220

Abstract

What defines the special character of Pirandello's works is the fact that he creates his own literary movement, which draws on the duality of theoretical and practical aspects. His own practice led Pirandello to the creation of a theory (‘humorism') that declares analytical dismantling of reality to be the ultimate goal of literature in order to depict the world as a series of illusions devoid of a unifying central idea. Guided by this postulate, Pirandello was close to deconstruction of the tools he used, namely the novel and the play. His reimagining of the novel was less radical: the revision of this form remained incomplete. His reforms of playwriting principles were more advanced, as Pirandello problematised and rejected traditional oppositions — primarily, the opposition of art to reality. In The Mountain Giants [I giganti della montagna], his final and unfinished play, Pirandello attempted to create a myth about art as a medium between the material and the ideal, but, confined to the rules of ‘humorism', he remained trapped by this contradiction.

About the Author

M. L. Andreev
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the RAS; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; National Research University — Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Mikhail L. Andreev - Doctor of Philology.

25a Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069.



References

1. Anderson, G. (1982). Il saggista Pirandello lettore di Gabriel Seailles. In: G. Anderson and P. D. Giovanelli, eds., Pirandello saggista. Palermo: Palumbo, pp. 13-21. (In Italian).

2. Andreev, M. (2019). Pirandello's dramas in the history of the genre. Dialog so Vremenem, 67, pp. 291-298. (In Russ.)

3. Caputo, R. (1996). L' ‘Umorismo' nel pensiero critico del primo Novecento. In: R. Caputo, Jl piccolo padreterno. Saggi di lettura dell'opera pirandelliana. Roma: Euroma, pp. 159-171. (In Italian).

4. Croce, B. (1940). Luigi Pirandello. In: B. Croce, La letteratura della nuova Jtalia (6 vols). Vol. VJ. Bari: Laterza, pp. 353-371. (In Italian).

5. Frassica, P. (1996). ‘I Giganti' e la poetica dell'incompiuta. In: A. Alessio and G. S. Katz, eds., Le fonti di Pirandello. Palermo: Palumbo, pp. 121-133. (In Italian).

6. Gioviale, F. (1984). La poetica narrativa di Pirandello. Tipologia e aspetti del romanzo. Bologna: Patron. (In Italian).

7. Lauretta, E., ed. (1975). J miti di Pirandello. Palermo: Palumbo. (In Italian).

8. Lauretta, E., ed. (1977). Jl teatro nel teatro di Pirandello. Agrigento: Centro Naz. di Studi Pirandelliani. (In Italian).

9. Pirandello, L. (1993). L'Umorismo. Milano: Baldini e Castoldi. (In Italian).

10. Reizov, B. (1970). Luigi Pirandello's novel ‘The Late Mattia Pascal.' In: B. Reizov, From the history of European literatures. Leningrad: Leningradsky un-t, pp. 331-345. (In Russ.)

11. Stella, V. (1984). Pirandello e la filosofia italiana. In: S. Milioto and E. Scrivano, eds., Pirandello e la cultura del suo tempo. Milano: Mursia, pp. 5-30. (In Italian).

12. Villa, E. (1976). Dinamica narrativa di Luigi Pirandello. Padova: Liviana. (In Italian).


Review

For citations:


Andreev M.L. Pirandello: a theory and practice of «humorism». Voprosy literatury. 2021;(2):203-220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-2-203-220

Views: 313


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)