Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A drawing by Leonardo da Vinci and the shaping of D. Merezhkovsky’s literary reputation

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-1-145-160

Abstract

The article considers the background of the little-known letter written by D. Merezhkovsky to Novoe Vremya in 1901 with regard to the novel Resurrected Gods. Leonardo da Vinci [Voskresshie bogi. Leonardo da Vinchi] and establishes the circumstances that prompted such a reaction to V. Burenin’s feuilleton. The novel was written during the period of bitter competition with A. Volynsky, who had authored a study of Leonardo da Vinci’s life. Merezhkovsky’s suspicion that the latter may have plagiarised his original plot resulted in an acrimonious rivalry. In his letter, Merezhkovsky chooses to focus on the author’s ‘scholarly scrupulosity’ and the authoritative opinion of European audiences, who had long acknowledged his writing talent, rather than on prejudiced reviews of his novels penned by newspaper-employed critics. The article argues that what really provoked Merezhkovsky to approach the newspaper was his resentment of unfair allegations, rather than an attempt to defend the authenticity of Leonardo’s drawing. Hostile reviews of his novel in the periodicals contradicted Merezhkovsky’s efforts to create his own reputation as a writer.

About the Author

E. A. Andrushchenko
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Elena A. Andrushchenko - Doctor of Philology.

25а Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069



References

1. A.L. L. (1901). Vyzeva’s article about Tolstoy. Litemtumiy Vestnik, 3(1), p. 306. (In Russ.)

2. Andrushchenko, E. (2017). ‘Instead of leaves <...> smoked herring’: Early symbolism in publications of ‘Novoe Vremya.’ In: M. Latkowski, ed., Prasa w rosyjskmprocesie historycznoliterackim. Vol. 1. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej, Uniwer- sytet Warszawski, pp. 73-84. (In Russ.)

3. Andrushchenko, E., ed. (2017). The collected works of D. Merezhkovsky (20 vols). Vol. 8: Eternal companions [Vechnye sputniki]. Moscow: Dmitry Sechin. (In Russ.)

4. Bazanov, V. et al., eds. (1986). The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 29. Book 2. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)

5. Bibliolog. (1902). Trilogy about Christ and Antichrist. Literaturniy Vestnik, 8(1), pp. 317-322. (In Russ.)

6. Burenin, V. (1899a). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 8213, p. 2. (In Russ.)

7. Burenin, V. (1899b). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 8234, p. 2. (In Russ.)

8. Burenin, V. (1899c). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 8268, p. 2. (In Russ.)

9. Burenin, V. (1899d). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 8275, p. 2. (In Russ.)

10. Burenin, V. (1901a). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 9247, p. 2. (In Russ.)

11. Burenin, V. (1901b). Critical essays. Novoe Vremya, 9254, p. 2. (In Russ.)

12. G. K. (1902a). M. Gorky and D. Merezhkovsky in Italy. Literaturniy Vestnik, 3(2), p. 233. (In Russ.)

13. G. K. (1902b). Gorky, Tolstoy, Turgenev, Chekhov, Merezhkovsky in Italy. Literaturniy Vestnik, 3(2), p. 234. (In Russ.)

14. Gorodnitsky, R. and Serkov, A., eds. (2019). The collected works of Z. Gippius-Merezhkovskaya (15 vols). Vol. 16 (additional): Him and us. Dmitry Merezhkovsky. His life, his work. Moscow: Dmitry Sechin. (In Russ.)

15. Grinevich, P. (1900). Reader’s notes. Russkoe Bogatstvo, 4, pp. 140-151. (In Russ.)

16. Kholikov, A. (2019). ‘The village of Vinci’ [‘Selenie Vinchi’] by D. S. Merezhkovsky: Transformations of the text from egodocument to fiction. Noviy Filologicheskiy Vestnik, 48(1), pp. 120-140. (In Russ.)

17. Kholikov, A., ed. (2019). The collected works of D. Merezhkovsky (20 vols). Vol. 9: On the causes of the decline and on the new trends in contemporary Russian literature: Articles of 1880-1890. Moscow: Dmitry Sechin. (In Russ.)

18. Larin, O. (1914). A chronological index of D. S. Merezhkovsky’s works and of papers about his works. In: The complete works of D. Merezhkovsky (24 vols). Vol. 24. Moscow: I. D. Sytin, pp. 117-149. (In Russ.)

19. Merezhkovsky, D. (1901). A letter to the editorial board. Novoe Vremya, 9248, p. 4. (In Russ.)

20. Merezhkovsky, D. (1991a). A letter to P. P. Pertsov. Annotated by M. Koreneva. Russkaya Literatura, 2, pp. 156-180. (In Russ.)

21. Merezhkovsky, D. (1991b). A letter to P. P. Pertsov. Annotated by M. Koreneva. Russkaya Literatura, 3, pp. 133-158. (In Russ.)

22. Mikhaylovsky, N. (1899). Literature and life. Russkoe Bogatstvo, 4, pp. 189-219. (In Russ.)

23. Polonsky, V. (2019). GALLO-ROSSICA: From the history of Russian-French literary ties of the late 18th - early 20th c. Moscow: IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)

24. Skriba. (1896). Letters to the editorial board. II. Novosti i Birzhevaya Gazeta, 343, p. 2. (In Russ.)

25. Sumtsov, N. (1900). Leonardo da Vinci. Research by Professor N. F. Sumtsov. Kharkiv: Tipo-lit. ‘Pechatnoe Delo’ kn. K. N. Gagarina. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Andrushchenko E.A. A drawing by Leonardo da Vinci and the shaping of D. Merezhkovsky’s literary reputation. Voprosy literatury. 2021;(1):145-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2021-1-145-160

Views: 321


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)