K. CHUKOVSKY AND V. NABOKOV: GLIMPSES OF THEIR PERSONAL AND LITERARY RELATIONSHIPS
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-2-180-206
Abstract
The relationship between K. Chukovsky and V. Nabokov is a topic little covered by scholars. Even less is written about the mutual literary influence of the two preeminent Russian authors. The article examines their journals, letters and literary works to reveal the development of their artistic disputes.
Doyens of Russian culture, the two simply couldn’t have ignored each other, especially as they met in person before the Revolution and thanks to literary circumstances. The article shows that each one’s personal and artistic opinions were bound to cause a clash of worldviews, which indeed took place on paper, and continued without any face-to-face polemics.
The author finds a lot of similarities in the two writers’ creative method: they both demonstrate astonishing literary erudition, synthesize new imagery, plots and narrative forms. Both favoured formalistic and stylistic experimentation, literary game and cryptography, pranking, puns, allusions, and anagrams.
About the Author
I. PudikovRussian Federation
Igor Valerievich Pudikov, writer, medical doctor, senior lecturer
Author of numerous articles about the life and works of K. Chukovsky.
References
1. Babikov A. A. Motives of Eugene Onegin in the University Poem [Universitetskaya poema] by V. V. Nabokov // A. S. Pushkin and V. V. Nabokov: Collected papers of the International Conference. 15-18 April, 1999. St. Petersburg: Dorn, 1999. P. 268-278. (In Russ.)
2. Chukovsky K. I. Onegin in a Foreign Land // Druzhba narodov. 1988. Issue 4. P. 246-257. (In Russ.)
3. Chukovsky K. I. Eugene Onegin Nowadays // Chukovsky K. I. Poems / Comp. and notes by M. S. Petrovsky, with the participation of O. L. Kanunnikova. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2002. P. 319-352. (In Russ.)
4. Chukovsky K. I. Collected works in 15 vols. Moscow: Terra - Knizhniy klub, 2010. (In Russ.)
5. Classic Without Retouching. The Literary World on the Works of Vladimir Nabokov / Ed. N. G. Melnikov. Moscow: NLO, 2000. (In Russ.)
6. Friends, Butterflies and Monsters. From the Correspondence of Vladimir and Vera Nabokov with Roman Grinberg / Foreword, publ. and comments by R. Yangirov // The Diaspora: New materials. Paris; St. Petersburg: Athenaeum-Feniks, 2001. P. 447-556. (In Russ.)
7. Khodasevich V. F. On Sirin // Khodasevich V. F. Books and People. Sketches on Russian Literature / Comp. and foreword by M. D. Filin. Moscow: Zhizn’ i mysl, 2002. P. 425-431. (In Russ.)
8. Laplanche J., Pontalis J.-B. The Dictionary of Psychoanalysis / Translated from French by N. S. Avtonomova. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1996. (In Russ.)
9. Leving Y. Antipathy Dating Way Back: The Nabokovs and the Suvorins in Life and in Prose // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2009. Issue 2 (96). P. 154-190. (In Russ.)
10. Lukianova I. V. Korney Chukovsky. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 2006. (The Lives of Remarkable People Series). (In Russ.)
11. Nabokov V. V. Other Shores // Nabokov V. V. Collected works in 4 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow: Pravda, 1990. P. 133-304. (In Russ.)
12. Pudikov I. V. The Dynamics of Unconscious Mental Processes Based on the Materials of K. I. Chukovsky’s Fairy Tales // Edip. 2007. Issue 1. P. 96-99. (In Russ.)
13. Rusanov A. Features of the Intertext in the Novel Lolita by V. Nabokov // URL: http://nabokovandko.narod.ru/intertext.html. (In Russ.)
14. Rusanov A. V. Onegin Reminiscences in the Novel Lolita by V. Nabokov // Slavic World and Literature. Proceedings of the International Conference. Zelenogradsk, 10-13 October, 2002. Kaliningrad: KGU, 2003. P. 87-94. (In Russ.)
15. Shadursky V. V. Pushkin’s Subtexts in V. V. Nabokov’s Prose // A. S. Pushkin and V. V. Nabokov. P. 117-123. (In Russ.)
16. Steiner G. Psychic Retreats: Pathological Organizations in Psychotic, Neurotic and Borderline Patients / Translated from English. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2010. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Pudikov I. K. CHUKOVSKY AND V. NABOKOV: GLIMPSES OF THEIR PERSONAL AND LITERARY RELATIONSHIPS. Voprosy literatury. 2018;(2):180-206. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-2-180-206