Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search

HAMLET’S APPROPRIATION IN AUTEUR AND INDEPENDENT CINEMA

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-2-38-53

Abstract

The article focuses on the priorities in contemporary studies of cinematic adaptations. Looking at the various appropriations of this Shakespeare’s tragedy in art and indie movies, the researcher reveals how by underscoring the director’s visual imagination and the ‘power’ of a cinematic tradition one can revise the scope of adaptation studies. Concentrating on the signature elements of A. Kaurismäki’s and M. Almereyda’s cinematography, the author emphasizes the productivity of the audience’s ‘entrancement’ with the visual and sonic interpretation of the classical piece (through the use of the American film noir stylistics by Kaurismäki, and through Almereyda’s interplay of multiple on-screen realities). In the viewers’ memory, literary meanings are expelled rather aggressively by new cinematographic ones. Kaurismäki turns the tragedy into a tastefully stylized noir whodunit, while Almereyda went for a reflective narrative about neo-Hamletism at an age of expanding virtual realities. In her demonstration of how the directors achieved such effects, the author argues the priority of the cinematographic auteurship (including the case of collective auteurship) in the analysis of contemporary film adaptations.

About the Author

P. Rybina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Polina Yurievna Rybina, senior lecturer at the Department of General Literary Theory, Philological Faculty 

Academic and creative interests include the history and theory of cinematic adaptations, studies of cinematic narration, foreign literature of the 19th and 20th centuries (Western Europe and the USA), dramatic and theatrical art in the 20th century. Author of several papers on the aforementioned topics. 



References

1. Boyum J. G. Double Exposure: Fiction into Film. New York: Universe Books, 1985.

2. Cahir L. Literature into Film. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 2006.

3. Colоn Semenza G. M., Hasenfratz B. The History of British Literature on Film, 1895-2015. New York, London: Bloomsbury, 2015.

4. Hutcheon L. A. Theory of Adaptation. New York, London: Routledge, 2006.

5. Keyishian H. Shakespeare and Movie Genre: the Case of Hamlet // The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film / Ed. R. Jackson. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2007. P. 72-84.


Review

For citations:


Rybina P. HAMLET’S APPROPRIATION IN AUTEUR AND INDEPENDENT CINEMA. Voprosy literatury. 2018;(2):38-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-2-38-53

Views: 515


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)