

The bridge as a symbolic detail in Crime and Punishment [Prestuplenie i nakazanie]
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-6-182-193
Abstract
The article analyzes the significance of the ‘bridge’ detail in F. Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment [Prestuplenie i nakazanie]. The bridge is not a mere landscape feature, but a means of subtextual expression of the protagonist’s inner drama. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the detail’s artistic significance in the novel.
Examination of the plot sequences and the context for the mention of a bridge helps to establish its compositional role as a connector between two existential dimensions: the true one, inspired by realization of God’s design, and the false one, generated by Raskolnikov’s theory. The symbolic meaning of a bridge in the aesthetic universe can explain the character’s internal struggles and acute spiritual controversy.
The study of the functions of the ‘bridge’ detail in Dostoevsky’s novel clarifies the writer’s artistic intent and the book’s philosophical background.
About the Author
N. A. KladovaRussian Federation
Natalia A. Kladova – Candidate of Philology
9 Krasnaya Presnya St., Moscow, 123242
References
1. Belov, S. (1979). F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’: A commentary. St. Petersburg: Sovetskiy pisatel. (In Russ.)
2. Burova, Y. (2001). Biblical images in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novels ‘Crime and Punishment’ and ‘The Idiot’. Integratsiya Obrazovaniya, 1, pp. 43-45. (In Russ.)
3. Dmitrievskaya, L. (2013). The landscape of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’ as a possible allusion to the ‘Divine Comedy’ by Dante. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta, 1, pp. 103-106. (In Russ.)
4. Hotz, A. (1995). Structural features of Dostoevsky’s prose. In: G. Friedlander, ed., Dostoevsky: Materials and research. Vol. 11. St. Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 51-80. (In Russ.)
5. Karasyov, L. (1994). On Dostoevsky’s symbols. Voprosy Filosofii, 10, pp. 90-111. (In Russ.)
6. Karpacheva, T. (2013). The ‘eleventh hour’ motif in Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gorodskogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Philological Education Series, 1, pp. 56-61. (In Russ.)
7. Kasatkina, T. (2003). The resurrection of Lazarus: An exegetical reading of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’. Voprosy Literatury, 1, pp. 176-208. (In Russ.)
8. Kasatkina, T. (2004). On the creative nature of the word. Ontological words in F. Dostoevsky’s work as the basis of ‘realism in a higher sense’. Moscow: IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)
9. Korinfsky, A. (1901). The people’s Russia. Moscow: Izd. knigoprodavtsa M. V. Klyukina. (In Russ.)
10. Salvestroni, S. (2001). Biblical and patristic sources of Dostoevsky’s novels. Translated from Italian. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proekt. (In Russ.)
11. Toporov, V. (1973). On the structure of Dostoevsky’s novel in connection with archaic schemes of mythological thinking. In: J. van der Eng and M. Grygar, eds., Structure of texts and semiotics of culture. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, pp. 225-302. (In Russ.)
12. Torop, P. (1993). Reincarnation of characters in F. Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’. In: T. Zernova and N. Remizova, eds., F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel ‘Crime and Punishment’ in the literary studies of the 20th century. Izhevsk: Udmurtskiy un-t, pp. 148-160. (In Russ.)
13. Veresaev, V. (1999). Living life: On Dostoevsky. On Lev Tolstoy. On Nietzsche. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)
14. Vetlovskaya, V. (1997). The analysis of an epic work. Logic of the propositions (‘Otherworld’ in ‘Crime and Punishment’). In: N. Budanova and I. Yakubovich, eds., Dostoevsky: Materials and research. Vol. 14. St. Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 117-129. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kladova N.A. The bridge as a symbolic detail in Crime and Punishment [Prestuplenie i nakazanie]. Voprosy literatury. 2018;(6):182-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2018-6-182-193