Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

‘Emancipation from emancipation.’ The authors of The New Age on the aesthetic principles of new poetry

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2025-4-82-102

Abstract

The article offers a systematized overview of the aesthetic principles of new poetry, described as neoclassical by the London-based contributors of the magazine The New Age in their articles and books in the early 1910s. As key points for the systematization, the critic chooses the authors’ determination to contrast new poetry with 19th-c. aesthetic dogmas (Romanticism) and their fascination with political conservatism under the influence of L’Action Française, whose Bergson-inspired ideas of the purpose of creative work and the term for the new poetic phenomenon The New Age authors borrowed. The article studies the following sources to glean ideas about new Classicism: T. E. Hulme’s magazine publications and lectures, E. Pound’s articles and The Spirit of Romance (1910), J. M. Kennedy’s English Literature, 1880–1905 (1912), and comments by A. R. Orage and F. S. Flint. Rather than a distinct ideological or artistic phenomenon, ‘new Classicism’ is perceived as a ‘new classical spirit,’ the zeitgeist that stimulated modernist poetry in the 1910s.

About the Author

O. I. Polovinkina
Russian State University for the Humanities; A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Olga I. Polovinkina, Doctor of Philology, Professor

6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047

25A/1 Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069



References

1. Antliff, M. (1993). Inventing Bergson. Cultural politics and the Parisian ‘avantgarde.’ Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton U. P.

2. Antliff, M. and Leighten, P. D. (2001). Cubism and culture. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.

3. Babbitt, I. (1986). Literature and the American college. Essays in defense of the humanities. Boston: National Humanities Institute.

4. Carr, H. (2013). The verse revolutionaries. Ezra Pound, H. D. and The Imagists. London: Random House.

5. Ferguson, R. (2002). The short sharp life of T. E. Hulme. London: Allen.

6. Flint, F. S. (1913). Imagisme. Poetry: A Magazine of Verse, 1(6), pp. 198-200.

7. Fokin, S. (2018). Charles Maurras and the literature of ‘Action Française.’ Voprosy Literatury, 1, pp. 280-291. (In Russ.)

8. Hulme, T. E. (1911a). Bax on Bergson. The New Age, 9(14), pp. 328-331.

9. Hulme, T. E. (1911b). L’Attitude du Lyrisme Contemporain. By Tancrède de Visan. (Mercure de France.) The New Age, 9(17), pp. 400-401.

10. Hulme, T. E. (1911c). Notes on Bergson — II. The New Age, 9(26), pp. 610-611.

11. Hulme, T. E. (T. E. H.) (1911). Mister Balfur, Bergson and Politics. The New Age, 10(2), pp. 38-40.

12. Hulme, T. E. (1924). Speculations: Essays on humanism and the philosophy of art. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

13. Hulme, T. E. (2003). Selected writings. London: Routledge.

14. Kennedy, J. M. (1912). English literature, 1880-1905. London: Stephen Swift.

15. Lasserre, P. (1902). La morale du Nietzsche. Paris: Société du Mercure de France. (In French).

16. Lewis, W. H. (1927). Time and Western man. London: Chatto and Windus.

17. McGuinness, P. (2003). Preface. In: T. E. Hulme, Selected writings. London: Routledge, pp. vii-xliv.

18. Mead, H. (2015). T. E. Hulme and the ideological politics of early modernism. London: Bloomsbury.

19. Orage A. R. (R. H. C.) (1918). Readers and Writers. The New Age, 23(13), p. 201.

20. Polovinkina, O. (2009). Narcissus’ consciousness: English romanticism in the mirror of modernist critical thought. In: А. Sarukhanyan, ed., English literature from the 19th to 20th century, from the 20th to 21st century. Moscow: IMLI RAN, pp. 138-156. (In Russ.)

21. Pound, E. (1910). The spirit of romance; an attempt to define somewhat the charm of the Pre-Renaissance literature of Latin Europe. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.

22. Pound, E. (1911). I Gather the Limbs of Osiris. The New Age, 10(6), pp. 130- 131.

23. Pound, E. (1912a). I Gather the Limbs of Osiris. The New Age, 10(13), pp. 297- 399.

24. Pound, E. (1912b). Prolegomena. The Poetry Review, February, pp. 72-76.

25. Pound, E. (1913). A Few Don’ts by an Imagiste. Poetry: A Magazine of Verse, 1(6), pp. 200-206.

26. Pound, E. (1967). The new poetry. In: E. Pound and E. Fenollosa, Instigations of Ezra Pound. Together with an essay on the Chinese written character by Ernest Fenollosa. Freeport (New York): Books for Libraries Press, pp. 235-246.

27. Symons, A. (1909). The romantic movement in English poetry. New York: Dutton.

28. ‘The Spectator.’ With notes, and a general index in 2 vols. Vol. 2. (1826). New York: Samuel Marks.

29. Visan, T. de. (1911). L’Attitude du lyrisme contemporain. Paris: Mercure de France. (In French).


Review

For citations:


Polovinkina O.I. ‘Emancipation from emancipation.’ The authors of The New Age on the aesthetic principles of new poetry. Voprosy literatury. 2025;(4):82-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2025-4-82-102

Views: 6


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)