Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Literature of testimony between oblivion and deliberate omission

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105

Abstract

Prison camp texts constitute a very important stratum of 20th-c. literature. On their way to the reader, they overcome the barriers of fear and reluctance to immerse oneself into a complex and traumatic narrative, a recurrent risk of oblivion, and repeated suppression by censorship — on behalf of the authorities and educational institutions as well as society in general. Russian and Polish literature about gulags not only shares the same trauma and publication destiny, but also common topics, methods, and approaches to describing the unutterable experience. Two writers that embody this process — Herling-Grudziński and Shalamov — never met in person, but succeeded in conveying essential messages to the reader about the destructive and corrupting effect of a prison camp, the senselessness of forced labour, and the dehumanization and degradation of a person trapped in such an environment. The literary dialogue between the two authors contains a powerful system of reference for the study of 20th-c. Polish and Russian prison camp prose.

About the Author

K. L. Filimonova
University of Naples ‘L’Orientale’
Italy

Ksenia L . Filimonova - Candidate of Philology

Via Chiatamone 61/62, Naples, 80121, Campania



References

1. Dubin, B. (1993). The end of tragedy. Noviy Mir, 6, pp. 239-242. (In Russ.)

2. Gorbanevskaya, N. (1991). ‘The human land.’ Re-reading Józef Czapski’s articles. Kontinent, 68, pp. 224-241. (In Russ.)

3. Herling, G. (1951). A world apart. London: W. Heinemann. Herling-Grudziński, G. (2019).

4. The brand. The last Kolyma-story. Memorized, narrated. A talk about Shalamov. Translated by I. Ugnevskaya, S. Makartsev and I. Belov. Kraków, Warsaw: Institut knigi. (In Russ.)

5. Mikhaylik, E. (2009). Non-reflective and shadow-free: The ‘closed’ society and prison camp literature. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 100, pp. 356-375. (In Russ.)

6. Shalamov, V. (1964). V. Shalamov’s letter to F. Vigdorova. Moscow, 16 June 1964. [online] Shalamov.ru. Available at: https://shalamov.ru/library/24/26.html [Accessed 20 Sept. 2022]. (In Russ.)

7. Sukharski, Т. (2011). Varlam Shalamov and Polish literature. [online] Proceedings of the conference ‘Varlam Shalamov’s life and work in the context of world literature and Soviet history.’ 6-19 June 2011. Moscow — Vologda. Available at: https://shalamov.ru/events/23/22.html [Accessed 20 Sept. 2022]. (In Russ.)

8. Toker, L. (2000). Return from the Archipelago: Narratives of Gulag survivors. Bloomington: Indiana U. P.


Review

For citations:


Filimonova K.L. Literature of testimony between oblivion and deliberate omission. Voprosy literatury. 2023;(6):94-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-94-105

Views: 118


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)