

Shakespeare’s reflective genre. On reflection involved in the staging of culture
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-13-32
Abstract
The opposition of two terms, tradition vs reflection, is laid at the foundation of the construct which is often accepted now as a representation of world culture in the process of its staging. ‘Tradition’ stands for the collective mind and the ritual/norm, while ‘reflection’ covers the growth of the individual talent liberating itself from the normative authority of generic and other prescriptions. The borderline — beyond which the power of genre with its rules, rigidly established in the classical poetics, visibly loses its prescriptive power and individual talent takes over — is usually located somewhere between the late Renaissance and the early romantic era. Among the generic forms thatrepresent a new reflective genre, S. Averintsev reckons the novel by Cervantes, Shakespeare’s tragedies, Montaigne’s essays, Pascal’s intellectual prose... In the present article, the renaissance sonnet is added to this list due to the role it played in ‘the origin of the modern mind’ (P. Oppenheimer) and its three hundred years of domination in European lyric poetry. The sonnet, with special attention given to Shakespeare’s sequence, is analyzed after a model elaborated by M. Bakhtin for the novel and by Y. Tynyanov for the Russian ode.
About the Author
I. O. ShaytanovRussian Federation
Igor O. Shaytanov - Doctor of Philology
6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Averintsev, S. (1981). Ancient Greek poetics and world literature. In: S. Averintsev, ed., Poetics of Ancient Greek literature. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 3-14. (In Russ.)
2. Babb, L. (1951). The Elizabethan malady. A study of melancholia in English literature from 1580 to 1642. East Lansing: Michigan State College Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. (2012). Novel as a literary genre. In: M. Bakhtin, Collected works (7 vols). Vol. 3. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, pp. 608-654. (In Russ.)
4. Brooks-Davies, D. (1992). Introduction. In: D. Brooks-Davies, Silver poets of the sixteenth century. London; Vermont: Everyman, pp. xli-l.
5. Crystal, D. and Crystal, B. (2002). Shakespeare’s words. A glossary and language companion. London: Penguin Books.
6. Eichenbaum, B. (1969). The melodics of Russian lyric verse. In: B. Eichenbaum, On poetry. Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel, pp. 327-511. (In Russ.)
7. Evdokimova, L. (2000). Culture of the court of Frederick II, and the Sicilian School of poetry. In: M. Andreev and R. Khlodovsky, eds., History of Italian literature. Vol. 1. Moscow: IMLI RAN, ‘Nasledie,’ pp. 154-175. (In Russ.)
8. Mahood, M. (2001). Textual analysis. In: W. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice. Ed. by M. Mahood. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., pp. 179-183.
9. McAlindon, T. (1991). Shakespeare’s tragic cosmos. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P. Oppenheimer, P. (1989). New facts and a theory. In: P.
10. Oppenheimer, The birth of the modern mind: Self, consciousness, and the invention of the sonnet. New York: Oxford U. P., pp. 1-40.
11. Panofsky, E. (1998). Renaissance and Renascences in Western art. Translated by A. Gabrichevsky. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
12. Pinsky, L. (1961). Realism of the Renaissance. Moscow: GIKhL. (In Russ.)
13. Tynyanov, Y. (1977a). On literary evolution. In: Y. Tynyanov, Poetics. History of literature. Cinema. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 270-281. (In Russ.)
14. Tynyanov, Y. (1977b). On parody. In: Y. Tynyanov, Poetics. History of literature. Cinema. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 284-309. (In Russ.)
15. Shakespeare, W. (2022). Sonnets. Ed. by I. Shaytanov. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
16. Shaytanov, I. (2017). Wit play in the Renaissance sonnet. Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 222-236. (In Russ.)
17. Shaytanov, I. (2018). Shakespeare’s wit as a translation problem. Prosodia, 9, pp. 107-118. (In Russ.)
18. Shaytanov, I. (2019). How to translate the genre? Wit in the English Renaissance sonnet. Shagi, 5(3), pp. 152-170. (In Russ.)
19. Shaytanov, I. (2021). Beyond the epic. ‘Richard II’ and the nature of the tragic in Shakespeare. Studia Litterarum, 6(4), pp. 120-141. (In Russ.)
20. Shaytanov, I. (2023). Genre Shakespeare. An essay in historical poetics. Moscow: RGGU. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shaytanov I.O. Shakespeare’s reflective genre. On reflection involved in the staging of culture. Voprosy literatury. 2023;(6):13-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-6-13-32