|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The making of a hero. Pushkin’s problematic comedy Boris Godunov through the prism of Veselovsky’s differentiation of poetic genres
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-3-36-92
Abstract
Relying on A. Veselovsky’s definition of drama as being centred on a character rather than action, the author reexamines the Aristotelian definition of comedy and uncovers the innovative nature of Pushkin’s comedy. The study aims to demonstrate the close semblance between Pushkin’s and Veselovsky’s understanding of drama, using the comedy Boris Godunov as an example. Founded in Veselovsky’s works in its theoretical and analytical premises, the article also references contemporary scholarly apparatus, including the latest findings of general systems theory. In her analysis, the author offers a new classification of the dramatic genre and identifies the characteristics of the Pushkinian comedy that make it ‘problematic,’ in the sense of I. Shaytanov’s interpretation of the term. The article also addresses Pushkin’s use of ambiguity about Godunov’s involvement in the assassination of the young prince Dimitry. The author draws a parallel with wave-particle duality, where the decision of whether a particle or a wave is observed depends on the experimenter’s intentions. The poet’s use of ambiguity as a narrative device implies a hidden subplot of a coup d’état.
About the Author
V. K. ZubarevaRussian Federation
Vera K. Zubareva, PhD, writer, literary critic, independent researcher
125009
10 Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Ln.
Moscow
References
1. Alekseev, M. (1972). Pushkin’s remark ‘The people are silent.’ In: M. Alekseev, Pushkin: Comparative historical studies. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 208-239. (In Russ.)
2. Aristotle. (1983). Poetics. Translated by M. Gasparov. In: A. Dovatur, ed., The works of Aristotle (4 vols). Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl, pp. 645-681. (In Russ.)
3. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Aesthetics of verbal art. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
4. Baymukhametov, S. (2008). Did Boris Godunov kill Tsarevich Dmitry? In: S. Baymukhametov, Ghosts of history. Moscow: AST, Olipm. Available at: https://history.wikireading.ru/248249 [Accessed 1 Feb. 2023]. (In Russ.)
5. Bely, A. (1995). ‘I would know whence thou art sprung.’ Moscow: Indrik. (In Russ.)
6. Berdyaev, N. (2018). Spirits of the Russian Revolution. Moscow: T. 8. Rugram. (In Russ.)
7. Bertalanffy, L. von. (1976). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.
8. Blagoy, D. (1931). Sociology of Pushkin’s works. Etudes. 2<sup>nd</sup> expanded edition. Moscow: Mir. (In Russ.)
9. Blagoy, D. (1957). Pushkin’s historical tragedy ‘Boris Godunov.’ Moscow: Gosizdat. (In Russ.)
10. Bocharov, S. (1999). The plots of Russian literature. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury. (In Russ.)
11. Danilov, S. (1957). Russian drama theatre of the 19<sup>th</sup> century (2 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow, Leningrad: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
12. Fomichev, S. (2007). Pushkin’s perspective. Moscow: Znak. (In Russ.)
13. Gharajedaghi, J. (1985). Toward a systems theory of organization. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
14. Gukovsky, G. (1957). Pushkin and the problems of realistic style. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)
15. Kalashnikov, S. (2012). The metaplot ‘poet vs sovereign’ in A. S. Pushkin’s ‘Boris Godunov.’ Izvestiya VGPU, 1, pp. 126-129. (In Russ.)
16. Kara-Murza, A. (2014). Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ and Pushkin’s ‘The Bronze Horseman’ [‘Medniy vsadnik’]. Philosophical and political parallels. Filologicheskie Nauki, 1, pp. 75-87. (In Russ.)
17. Karamzin, N. (2014). History of the Russian state (4 vols). Vol. 4. Moscow: Delibri. (In Russ.)
18. Katsenelinboigen, A. (2014). Chess. [Online]. Available at: http://litved.com/арон-каценелинбойген-шахматы/ [Accessed 1 Feb. 2023]. (In Russ.)
19. Kunin, V. (1987). The story of Pushkin’s life, told by himself and his contempo raries (2 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Pravda. (In Russ.)
20. Listov, V. and Tarkhova, N. (1982). Towards the history of the remark ‘The people are silent’ in ‘Boris Godunov.’ In: M. Alekseev, ed., Chronicle of the Pushkin Commission, 1979. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 96-102. (In Russ.)
21. Lotman, L. (1974). Realism of the 1860s Russian literature. (Origins and aesthetic originality). Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)
22. Lotman, L. (1996). Historical and literary commentary. In: A. Pushkin, Boris Godunov. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proekt, pp. 129-359. (In Russ.)
23. Lotman, Y. (1992). Selected articles (3 vols). Vol. 3. Tallinn: Aleksandra. (In Russ.)
24. Lotman, Y. (1995). Pushkin: An essay on his work. In: Y. Lotman, Pushkin: A biography of the writer; Articles and notes, 1960-1990; ‘Eugene Onegin’: Commentary. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB, pp. 187-211. (In Russ.)
25. Lotman, Y. (1998). On art. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB. (In Russ.)
26. Machiavelli, N. (2018). The Prince. The art of power. Translated by G. Muravyova. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
27. Makarenko, E. (2011). Karamzin motifs in A. S. Pushkin’s tragedy ‘Boris Godunov.’ Vestnik TGPU, 11, pp. 9-101. (In Russ.)
28. Meyerhold, V. (1936). Pushkin as a director. Zvezda, 9, pp. 205-211. (In Russ.)
29. Nadoumko, N. (1831). ‘Boris Godunov.’ A. Pushkin’s work. A conversation between old acquaintances. Teleskop, Part 1, 4, pp. 546-574. (In Russ.)
30. Nepomnyashchy, V. (1999). Poetry and fate: A book on Pushkin. Moscow: Moskovskiy gorodskoy fond podderzhki shkolnogo knigoizdaniya. (In Russ.)
31. Prendergast, C. (1978). Balzac: Fiction and melodrama. London: Arnold.
32. Shaytanov, I. (2010a). Editor’s preface. In: I. Shaytanov, ed., The selected works of A. Veselovsky. On the way to historical poetics. Moscow: Avtokniga, pp. 5-8. (In Russ.)
33. Shaytanov, I., ed. (2010b). The selected works of A. Veselovsky. On the way to historical poetics. Moscow: Avtokniga. (In Russ.)
34. Shaytanov, I., ed. (2011a). The selected works of A. Veselovsky. Historical poetics. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russ.)
35. Shaytanov, I. (2011b). Two ‘Failures’: ‘Measure for Measure’ and ‘Angelo.’ In: Е. Lutsenko and I. Shaytanov, eds., Problems of modern comparative studies. Moscow: Zhurnal ‘Voprosy literatury,’ pp. 111-135. (In Russ.)
36. Shaytanov, I. (2021). Beyond the epic. ‘Richard II’ and the nature of the tragic in Shakespeare. Studia Litterarum, 4, pp. 120-141. (In Russ.)
37. Shaytanov, I. (2022). The speech genre at the linguistic turn. In: E. Dmitrieva and S. Sapozhkov, eds., A champion of the enlightenment: Collected papers marking the 90<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the honorary Professor of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Valentin Ivanovich Korovin. Moscow: Litfakt, pp. 11-22. (In Russ.)
38. Shaytanov, I. (2023). The Shakespeare genre. A study in historical poetics. Moscow: RGGU. (In Russ.)
39. The terms of styles, art and philosophy. (2021). Studopedia, [online] 7 July. Available at: https://studopedia.ru/30_496_termini-stiley-iskusstva-i-filosofii--stranitsa.html [Accessed 1 Feb. 2023]. (In Russ.)
40. Tomashevsky, B., ed. (1977-1979). The complete works of A. Pushkin (10 vols). 4<sup>th</sup> ed. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russ.)
41. Tyupa, V. (2009). ‘Boris Godunov’ and the genre nature of the tragedy. Noviy Filologicheskiy Vestnik, 8 (1). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/boris-godunov-i-zhanrovaya-priroda-tragedii [Accessed 1 Feb. 2023]. (In Russ.)
42. Ulea, V. (2002). A concept of dramatic genre and the comedy of a new type. Chess, literature, and film. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois U. P.
43. Vatsuro, V., ed. (1986). The works of A. Delvig. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)
44. Vatsuro, V. (2000). The historical tragedy and romantic drama of the 1830s. In: V. Vatsuro, Pushkin’s time: Collected papers. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proekt, pp. 559-603. (In Russ.)
45. Veselovsky, A. (2016). A. Zhukovsky. Poetry of feeling and ‘heart imagination.’ Moscow, St. Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russ.)
46. Vinokur, G. (1999). Collected works. Commentary on A. S. Pushkin’s ‘Boris Godunov.’ Moscow: Labirint. (In Russ.)
47. Virolaynen, M. et al, eds. (2009). Pushkin encyclopaedia. Works. Issue 1: A — D. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)
48. Vogman, V. (2019). Pushkin and Nicholas I. Research and materials. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. (In Russ.)
49. Zakharov, N. (2014). Shakespeareanism in A. S. Pushkin’s works. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2, pp. 235-248. (In Russ.)
50. Zubarev, V. (1997). A systems approach to literature: Mythopoetics of Chekhov’s four major plays. Westport Ct.: Greenwood Press.
51. Zubareva, V. (2011). Chekhov as a founder of the comedy of a new type. Voprosy Literatury, 4, pp. 92-123. (In Russ.)
52. Zubareva, V. (2013). Rereading A. Veselovsky in the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Voprosy Literatury, 5, pp. 47-82. (In Russ.)
53. Zubareva, V. (2015). Chekhov in the 21<sup>st</sup> century: The positional style and the comedy of a new type. Idyllwild, CA: Charles Schlacks, Jr. Publisher. (In Russ.)
54. Zubareva, V. (2022). In search of a ‘crosscurrent.’ The metaplot of ‘Eugene Onegin.’ Voprosy Literatury, 1, pp. 13-54. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Zubareva V.K. The making of a hero. Pushkin’s problematic comedy Boris Godunov through the prism of Veselovsky’s differentiation of poetic genres. Voprosy literatury. 2023;(3):36-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-3-36-92
Views:
188
Email this article 
