Preview

Voprosy literatury

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dostoevsky: Art theory and art appreciation theory

https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-6-62-80

Abstract

The article discusses the author problem in art and focuses on one particular aspect of Dostoevsky’s theory of creative process, namely, his view of reader/audience response, of the author’s high responsibility and their reciprocation necessary for an adequate communication. In his intricately humorous Winter Notes on Summer Impressions [Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniyakh], Dostoevsky uses comical situations of his own non-encounters with architecture, artefacts and personalities of a very closely related, ‘second home’ culture, which nevertheless remained altogether different to that of Russia, in order to describe the core principles of interaction which drive the understanding and correct appreciation of art. These principles not only stipulate the possibility of artist-recipient interactions within an act of artistic creation and its appreciation, but also enable communication between two dissimilar cultures that is based on productive cooperation rather than antagonism. Dostoevsky stresses the responsibility of both the artist and the recipient of art for accurately transmitting and perceiving meanings, and argues the importance of a sincere effort on behalf of the two in order to ensure adequate communication

About the Author

T. A. Kasatkina
A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

 Tatiana A. K asatkina, Doctor of Philology

25a Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069 



References

1. Blagoy, D. et al., eds. (1962). The collected works of A. Pushkin (10 vols). Vol. 9. Moscow: GIKhL. (In Russ.)

2. Dahl, V. (1862). Proverbs of the Russian people. Moscow: V Universitetskoy Tip. (In Russ.)

3. Dostoevsky, F. (1973). Winter notes on summer impressions. In: G. Fridlender, ed., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 5. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 46-98. (In Russ.)

4. Dostoevsky, F. (1978). Mr. –bov and the question of art. In: V. Tunimanov and G. Fridlender, eds., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 18. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 70-103. (In Russ.)

5. Dostoevsky, F. (1981). The writer’s diary. In: E. Kiyko and G. Fridlender, eds., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 23. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 5-162. (In Russ.)

6. Kasatkina, T. (2004). On the creative nature of the word. The ontology of the word in F. M. Dostoevsky’s works as the basis of ‘realism in the highest sense.’ Moscow: IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)

7. Kasatkina, T. (2019). Dostoevsky as a philosopher and theologian: An artistic method of expression. Moscow: Vodoley. (In Russ.)

8. Kasatkina, T. (2020). Anagogic story as the specifc structure of Dostoevsky’s early ‘gnostic’ texts. Dostoevsky i Mirovaya Kultura. Filologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2(10), pp. 95-115. (In Russ.)

9. Magaril-Iliaeva, T. (2021). The 1847 feuilletons as a dictionary of the philosophy of Dostoevsky’s early works. Dostoevsky i Mirovaya Kultura. Filologicheskiy Zhurnal, 4(16), pp. 24-41. (In Russ.)

10. Mikhaylov, A. (2001). Several theses on the theory of literature. In: T. Kasatkina, ed., Literary criticism as a problem. Moscow: Nasledie, pp. 224- 279. (In Russ.)

11. Popova, I., ed. (2010). The collected works of M. Bakhtin (7 vols). Vol. 4. Part 2. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kasatkina T.A. Dostoevsky: Art theory and art appreciation theory. Voprosy literatury. 2022;(6):62-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-6-62-80

Views: 180


ISSN 0042-8795 (Print)