

The scholarly aspect of Conversation about Dante [Razgovor o Dante]
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-2-148-164
Abstract
Due to its highly metaphoric language, O. Mandelstam’s Conversation about Dante [Razgovor o Dante] holds a unique place among studies of the Divine Comedy. This provokes its diverging interpretations and even questions the work’s scholarly aspect. In order to discover the best way to treat Conversation about Dante, one should assume it contains several aspects (a description of the author’s own poetics, reflections on the general workings of poetry, and observations of Dante’s language and imagery) and proceed to analyse each statement made in the essay. The article sets out to undertake the same, to a small extent, by examining a specific comment on the imagery of the Divine Comedy made in Conversation about Dante — namely, Mandelstam’s interpretation of Canto XVII of ‘Inferno’ and the character of Geryon, in particular. Through its analysis in comparison with Dante’s text and interpretations of Geryon by academic philologists, and by tracing the sources and history of this image, we find that Mandelstam’s treatment of this fragment is well justified from the viewpoint of Dante studies.
About the Author
A. M. PenkinaRussian Federation
Arina M. Penkina - historian of literature.
82/1 Vernadsky Av., Moscow, 119571
References
1. Averintsev, S. (2012). Preface to part one. In: Е. Glazova and М. Glazova, ‘Suggested by Dante.’ On Mandelstam, s poetics and poetry. Kyiv: Dukh i literа, pp. 27-31. (In Russ.)
2. Batkin, L. (1994). Dante as perceived by Mandelstam. In: L. Batkin, Passions. Selected essays and articles on culture. Moscow: ТОО ‘Kursiv-А,’ pp. 123-128. (In Russ.)
3. Corrado, M. (2013). Il Gerione dantesco fra tradizione mitografica e illustrativa. Rivista di Studi Danteschi, XIII(2), pp. 422-433. (In Italian).
4. Croce, B. (1921). La poesia di Dante. Bari: Gius Laterza e figli. (In Italian).
5. Fiorentini, L. (2016). Il silenzio di Gerione (Inferno, XVI-XVII). Revista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa, 2, pp. 213-240. (In Italian).
6. Gayduk, V. (1971). On the colour symbolism of the Divine Comedy. In: I. Belza et al., eds., Dante Readings. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 174-180. (In Russ.)
7. Gerstein, E. (1998). Memoirs. St. Petersburg: Inapress. (In Russ.)
8. Ilyushin, А. (1990). Dante and Petrarch as interpreted by Mandelstam. In: О. Lasunsky, ed., O. E. Mandelstam’s life and work: Memoirs. Materials for the biography. ‘New Poems’ [‘Novye stikhi’]. Commentaries. Research. Voronezh: Voronezhskiy universitet, pp. 367-382. (In Russ.)
9. Kasianova, M. (2010). Who are the ‘three-body typhons’? On the possible interpretation of Eur. Herc. 1271-1273. Aristey, 1, pp. 53-69. (In Russ.)
10. Levin, Y. (1998). Notes on ‘Conversation about Dante’ [‘Razgovor o Dante’]. In: Y. Levin, Selected works. Poetry. Semiotics. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury, pp. 142-153. (In Russ.)
11. Mets, А., ed. (2010). The complete works and letters of O. Mandelstam (3 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Progress-Pleyada. (In Russ.)
12. Panova, L. (2017). Dante Alighieri. In: P. Nerler and О. Lekmanov, eds., The Mandelstam encyclopaedia (2 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, pp. 213-220. (In Russ.)
13. Pinsky, L. (1989). Dante’s poetics as seen by the poet. In: L. Pinsky, The main plot: F. Villon, W. Shakespeare, B. Gracián, W. Scott. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatel, pp. 367-395. (In Russ.)
14. Salsano, F. (1971). Gerione. In: U. Bosco, ed., Enciclopedia Dantesca (6 vols). Vol. 3. Roma: Instituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 124-126. (In Italian).
15. Stepanova, L., Levinton, G., Nerler, P. et al. (2010). Commentaries. In: А. Mets, ed., The complete works and letters of O. Mandelstam (3 vols). Vol. 2. Moscow: Progress-Pleyada, pp. 471-744. (In Russ.)
16. Tuczay, C. A. (2005). Motifs in the ‘Arabian Nights’ and in ancient medieval European literature: A comparison. Folklore, 116(3), pp. 272-291.
17. West, M. L. (2007). Indo-European poetry and myth. Oxford: Oxford U. P
Review
For citations:
Penkina A.M. The scholarly aspect of Conversation about Dante [Razgovor o Dante]. Voprosy literatury. 2022;(2):148-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2022-2-148-164