|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Metaphysics of the biography. How many parts to Shakespeare’s Sonnets?
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2020-6-144-177
Abstract
The two-part structure for the sequence of Shakespeare’s Sonnets was suggested by its first editor Edmund Malone at the end of the 18th c. and proved to be a long-standing tradition. Recently not a few attempts have been made to clarify the logic practiced by the Renaissance sonneteers in whose context Shakespeare’s lyrical narration is problematized. This article joins to ascertain the boundaries of inner cycles within the sequence in order to follow the denouement of its plot. The author argues that the Renaissance sequence, much unlike the narrative logic in the novel, does not present a consistent love story but rather the sessions of sweet silent thought (sonnet 30), reflective in the sonnet and growing more and more metaphysical in Shakespeare, both in diction and metaphor. Certain biographical allusions in the sequence (some of them advanced by the author) support that it was written between 1592 and 1603–1604 to the Earl of Southampton as its addressee.
About the Author
I. O. Shaytanov
Russian State University for the Humanities; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor О. Shaytanov – Doctor of Philology
6 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Booth, S., ed. (1977). Shakespeare’s Sonnets. New Haven, London: Yale U. P.
2. Grazia, M. de. (2007). Revolution in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In: M. Schoenfeldt, ed., A companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Oxford: WileyBlackwell, pp. 57-69.
3. Crystal D. and Crystal B. (2002). Shakespeare’s words. A glossary and language companion. London, New York: Penguin Books.
4. Kerrigan, J., ed. (1986). The Sonnets and ‘Lover’s Complaint.’ London, New York: Penguin.
5. Lutsenko, E. (2008). The musical technique of Shakespeare’s verse. Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 163-187. (In Russ.)
6. Mack, P. (2010). Reading and rhetoric in Montaigne and Shakespeare. London et al.: Bloomsbury.
7. Pogorelaya, E. (2013). I. A. Brodsky. Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 148-153. (In Russ.)
8. Sams, E. (1995). The real Shakespeare. Retrieving the early years, 1564-1594. New Haven, London: Yale U. P.
9. Schoenfeldt, M. (1988). The matter of inwardness. In: J. Schiffer, ed., Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Critical essays. New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc., pp. 305-324.
10. Shaytanov, I. (1996). The genre word in Bakhtin’s and the formalists’ works. Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 89-114. (In Russ.)
11. Shaytanov, I. (1997). The concept of the generic word: Bakhtin and the Russian Formalists. In: C. Adlam et al., eds., Face to face: Bakhtin in Russia and the West. Sheffield: Academic Press, pp. 233-253.
12. Shaytanov, I. (2016a). The last cycle: Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnets of 1603.’ Voprosy Literatury, 2, pp. 101-130. (In Russ.)
13. Shaytanov, I. (2016b). Translation as interpretation. Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnets of 1603.’ Inostrannaya Literatura, 5, pp. 187-199. (In Russ.)
14. Shaytanov, I. (2017). Wit play in the Renaissance sonnet. Voprosy Literatury, 6, pp. 222-236. (In Russ.)
15. Shaytanov, I. (2019). How to translate the genre? Wit in the English Renaissance sonnet. Shagi, 5(3), pp. 152-170. (In Russ.)
16. Stepanov, S. (2003). Shakespeare’s Sonnets, or, A game within a game. St. Petersburg: Amfora. (In Russ.)
17. Vendler, H. (1999). The art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard U. P.
18. Wilson, D., ed. (1966). The Sonnets. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge U. P.
19. Wright, T. G. (1988). The silent speech of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In: J. Schiffer, ed., Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Critical essays. New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc., pp. 135-160.
Review
For citations:
Shaytanov I.O. Metaphysics of the biography. How many parts to Shakespeare’s Sonnets? Voprosy literatury. 2020;(6):144-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2020-6-144-177
Views:
351
Email this article 
