|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
On Pushkin’s language
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2019-3-151-160
Abstract
The article explores the problems in the studies of Pushkin’s language, in particular, his typical word usage. In his polemic with critics (M. Epstein is among them), who accuse Pushkin of inaccuracies and historical blunders, the author reconstructs the historical context for certain words and justifies their specific usage in Pushkin’s works. The study focuses on such words as ‘zaperet’’ [‘to shut/lock’], ‘tasovat’sya’ [‘to socialize with’], etc. Thus the paper proves that Pushkin’s vocabulary may at times differ significantly from the modern usage (there is no shortage of such examples in the studies by the renowned linguist A. Penkovsky), or coincide with contemporary meanings (which is mostly the case), or sometimes astonish us with how it directly anticipates the phraseology we consider a modern invention. Here, as with any aspect of Pushkin’s work, rushed conclusions are out of place.
About the Author
V. M. Essipov
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor M. Essipov - literary critic.
25а Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069
References
1. Bocharov, S. (2007). Philological plots. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. (In Russ.)
2. Chumakov, Y. (2008). Pushkin. Tyutchev. A study in immanent interpretation. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)
3. Dal, V. (1994). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language (4 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress, Univers. (In Russ.)
4. Dictionary of the Russian Academy. Part 4. (1793). St. Petersburg: Tip. Imperatorskoy Akademii nauk. (In Russ.)
5. Epstein, М. (2018). Slips in Pushkin’s prose. Snob, [online] 13 Sept. Available at: https://snob.ru/profile/27356/blog/142298 [Accessed 11 Feb. 2019]. (In Russ.)
6. Essipov, V. (2016). On the fantastic theme in ‘The Queen of Spades’ [‘Pikovaya dama’]. In: V. Essipov, From Barkov to Mandelstam. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, pp. 137-142. (In Russ.)
7. Gorshkov, А. (1984). Theory and history of the Russian literary language. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. (In Russ.)
8. Gubaylobsky, V. (2015). The topology of ‘The Queen of Spades’ [‘Pikovaya dama’]. Noviy Mir, [online] 31 July. Available at: http://novymirjournal.ru/index.php/blogs/entry/topologiya-pikovoj-damy [Accessed 1 Mar. 2019]. (In Russ.)
9. Krasukhin, G. (2014). Two in one, or Once again on the genre of Pushkin’s ‘The Queen of Spades’ [‘Pikovaya dama’]. Znamya, 9, pp. 94-102. (In Russ.)
10. Magazanik, L. (1999). ‘The Queen of Spades’ [‘Pikovaya dama’]: Morphology and metaphysics of big tropes. In: Y. Borev, ed., Pushkin and theory of literature. Moscow: IMLI RAN; Nasledie, pp. 30-51. (In Russ.)
11. Penkovsky, А. (2003). Nina. The cultural myth of the golden age of Russian literature in linguistic context. Moscow: Indrik. (In Russ.)
12. Penkovsky, А. (2005). Riddles of the Pushkin text and vocabulary. A study in philological hermeneutics. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)
13. Vasiliev, N. (2013). On Pushkin: The language of the classic, the poetics of the novel ‘Eugene Onegin’ [‘Evgeny Onegin’], the writer and his contemporaries.
14. A monograph. Nizhny Novgorod, Saransk: Tip. ‘Krasniy Oktyabr’. (In Russ.) Vinogradov, V. (1935). Pushkin’s language. Pushkin and the history of the Russian literary language. Moscow, Leningrad: Academia. (In Russ.)
15. Vinogradov, V. (1982). Studies on the history of the Russian literary language of the i7th-igth centuries. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.)
16. Vinogradov, V., ed. (2000). The dictionary of Pushkin’s language (4 vols). 2nd ed. Moscow: Azbukovnik. (In Russ.)
17. Vinokur G., (1959). Selected works on the Russian language. Moscow: Gosudarstvenno uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdanie Min. Prosveshcheniya RSFSR. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Essipov V.M. On Pushkin’s language. Voprosy literatury. 2019;(3):153-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2019-3-151-160
Views:
499
Email this article 
