

Byron and the Russian Silver Age (1900s). The Protestant Cain as ‘native’ and ‘foreign’
https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2019-1-152-177
Abstract
The influence of Calvinism on Byron’s philosophy, as evidenced by his journals and epistolary legacy, as well as the leitmotif of his oeuvre, is well researched. But his unique interpretation of the Protestant ideas in specific works is largely uncovered by his scholars. Particularly interesting in this context is Byron’s mystery play Cain. The piece is a dramatization of Calvin’s idea about humanity’s predisposition to falling from grace or being saved, from the viewpoint of a man seeking knowledge who is branded with a curse. Byron’s Cain is typified by anxiety, a hungry search for knowledge, suffering, struggle, and defiance of God. This newly coined Cain entered Russian literature during the Silver Age. A keen look at the works of Nikolay Gumilyov, Ivan Bunin, and Vyacheslav Ivanov, as well as the latter’s polemic with Dmitry Merezhkovsky, reveals the emergence of the romantic Protestant character on a quest to supersede the traditional Russian understanding of the biblical story and the endemic beliefs about good and evil.
Keywords
About the Author
S. B. KorolyovaRussian Federation
Svetlana B. Korolyova - Doctor of Philology.
31а Minin St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603155
References
1. Anisimov, I. (1960). Byron. In: I. Anisimov, Classical legacy and Modernity. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatel, pp. 84-108. (In Russ.)
2. Beatty, B. (2004). Byron and the eighteenth century. In: B. Drummond, ed., Cambridge Companion to Byron. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., pp. 236-249.
3. Belinsky, V. (1981). Russian literature in 1840. In: N. Gey, ed., The complete works of V. Belinsky (9 vols). Vol. 3. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, pp. 408-448. (In Russ.)
4. Chameev, A. (1991). Milton in Byron’s work. In: S. Turaev, ed., The great romantic. Byron and world literature. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 61-72. (In Russ.)
5. Cochran, P., ed. (2011). Byron’s religion. Cambridge: Cambridge scholars press.
6. Diakonova, N. (1978). Byron. In: N. Diakonova, English Romanticism. Problems of aesthetics. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 104-131. (In Russ.)
7. Fedotova, N. (2009). Russian primitivism and spiritual Christianity. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Gumanitarnye Nauki, 151(3), pp. 76-82. (In Russ.)
8. Filatov, A. (2017). The content of the concept ‘Adamism’ and texts of N. Gumilyov containing the Adamic myth. STEPHANOS, 23(3), pp. 117-125. (In Russ.)
9. Gleckner, R. and Beatty, B., eds. (1997). The plays of Lord Byron: Сritical essays. Liverpool: London U. P.
10. Griffiths, O. (1935). Religion and learning: A study in English Presbyterian thought from the Bartholomew ejections (1662) to the foundation of the Unitarian movement. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.
11. Hirst, W., ed. (1991). Byron, the Bible and religion: Essays from the Twelfth International Byron Conference. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London, Cranbury: Associated U. P.
12. Ivanov, D. and Deshart, Y., eds. (1971-1987). The collected works of V. Ivanov
13. (4 vols). Brussels: Foyer Oriental Chrеtien. (In Russ.)
14. Ivanov, V. (1909). By the stars. Essays and aphorisms. St. Petersburg: Ory. (In Russ.)
15. Jones, C. K. (2013). ‘I was bred a moderate Presbyterian’: Byron, Thomas Chalmers and the Scottish religious heritage. In: G. Hopps and J. Stabler, eds., Romanticism and religion from Cowper to Wallace Stevens. Ashgate: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., pp. 107-119.
16. Klimova, S. (2012). Byron, The Bible and the French Enlightenment. Voprosy Filologii, 41(2), pp. 69-77. (In Russ.)
17. Leslie, A., ed. (1973—1994). Letters and journals of Lord Byron (13 vols). London: John Murray.
18. Losev, A. (2001). Franz Nietzsche. In: Y. Sineokaya, ed., Nietzsche: pro et contra. St. Petersburg: RKhGI, pp. 981-992. (In Russ.)
19. Lunacharsky, A. (1963). Theatrical impressions. In: I. Anisimov, ed., The collected works of A. Lunacharsky (8 vols). Vol. 6. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, pp. 371-388. (In Russ.)
20. McGann, J. J., ed. (1980-1993). The complete poetical works of Lord Byron (9 vols). Oxford: Oxford U. P.
21. Merezhkovsky, D. (1995). Lev Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Eternal companions. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)
22. Merezhkovsky, D. (2000). Mouth full of soil. In: D. Merezhkovsky, Not peace, but a sword. Kharkov: Folio; Moscow: AST, pp. 556-566. (In Russ.)
23. Merezhkovsky, D. (2002). The coming Ham. In: N. Bogomolov, ed., Russian symbolism: Literary criticism (2 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: AST, Olymp, pp. 62-93. (In Russ.)
24. Mikhaylenko, E. (2017). On the nature of Lucifer’s image in the mystery of G. G. Byron ‘Cain’. Sovremennye Tendentsii Razvitiya Nauki i Tekhnologiy, 3-6, pp. 47-49. (In Russ.)
25. Quinones, R. J. (2014). The changes of Cain: Violence and the lost brother in Cain and Abel literature. Princeton: Princeton U. P.
26. Rawes, A. (2012). Byron’s romantic Calvinism. Byron Journal, 40(2), pp. 129-140.
27. Ray, S. H. (2006). ‘I am more fit to die than people think’: Byron on immortality. Christianity and Literature, 55(3), pp. 333-367.
28. Ryan R. (1990). Byron’s ‘Cain’: The ironies of belief. Wordsworth Circle, 21(1), pp. 41-45.
29. Shcherbakova, L., ed. (1991). The works of N. Gumilyov (3 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)
30. Skatov, N., ed. (2006). The collected works of N. Gumilyov (10 vols). Vol. 7. Moscow: Voskresenie. (In Russ.)
31. Stanislavsky, K. (2000). Notes on ‘Cain’. In: P. Fisher and I. Zelmanov, eds., Stanislavsky rehearses: Notes and transcripts. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MKhT, pp. 141-168. (In Russ.)
32. Thorslev, P. (1962). The Byronic hero: Types and prototypes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Usmanova, R. (1981). George Gordon Byron. In: R. Usmanova, ed., The collected works of D. G. Byron (4 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Pravda, pp. 3-50. (In Russ.)
34. Veselovsky, A. (1914). Byron. A biographical sketch. Moscow: Kushnerev & K. (In Russ.)
35. Vladimirov, I., ed. (2009). The complete works of I. Bunin (9 vols). Vol. 9. Moscow: Terra. (In Russ.)
36. Weber, M. (1990). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated by M. Levina. In: Y. Davydov, ed., The selected works of M. Weber. Moscow: Progress, pp. 44-271. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Korolyova S.B. Byron and the Russian Silver Age (1900s). The Protestant Cain as ‘native’ and ‘foreign’. Voprosy literatury. 2019;(1):152-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2019-1-152-177