<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voplit</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы литературы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy literatury</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31425/0042-8795-2022-6-62-80</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voplit-600</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ РУССКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ / Ф. М. Достоевский</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE / F. M. Dostoevsky</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Достоевский: теория творчества и теория восприятия искусства</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Dostoevsky: Art theory and art appreciation theory</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Касаткина</surname><given-names>Т. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kasatkina</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Татьяна А лександровна Касаткина, доктор филологических наук</p><p>121069,  г. Москва, ул. Поварская, д. 25а</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p> Tatiana A. K asatkina, Doctor of Philology</p><p>25a Povarskaya St., Moscow, 121069 </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">t-kasatkina@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт мировой литературы имени А. М. Горького Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury», 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/600">https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/600</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена авторской теории творчества как теоретической проблеме и одному из аспектов авторской теории творчества Достоевского — его теории адекватного восприятия произведений искусства как она представлена в «Зимних заметках о летних впечатлениях»</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article discusses the author problem in art and focuses on one particular aspect of Dostoevsky’s theory of creative process, namely, his view of reader/audience response, of the author’s high responsibility and their reciprocation necessary for an adequate communication. In his intricately humorous Winter Notes on Summer Impressions [Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniyakh], Dostoevsky uses comical situations of his own non-encounters with architecture, artefacts and personalities of a very closely related, ‘second home’ culture, which nevertheless remained altogether diﬀerent to that of Russia, in order to describe the core principles of interaction which drive the understanding and correct appreciation of art. These principles not only stipulate the possibility of artist-recipient interactions within an act of artistic creation and its appreciation, but also enable communication between two dissimilar cultures that is based on productive cooperation rather than antagonism. Dostoevsky stresses the responsibility of both the artist and the recipient of art for accurately transmitting and perceiving meanings, and argues the importance of a sincere eﬀort on behalf of the two in order to ensure adequate communication</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Ф. Достоевский</kwd><kwd>«Зимние заметки о летних впечатлениях»</kwd><kwd>теория творчества</kwd><kwd>восприятие искусства</kwd><kwd>художественность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>F. Dostoevsky</kwd><kwd>Winter Notes on Summer Impressions [Zimnie zametki o letnikh vpechatleniyakh]</kwd><kwd>art theory</kwd><kwd>appreciation of art</kwd><kwd>an artistic quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахтин М. М. Собр. соч. в 7 тт. Т. 4. Ч. 2 / Под ред. И. Поповой. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blagoy, D. et al., eds. (1962). The collected works of A. Pushkin (10 vols). Vol. 9. Moscow: GIKhL. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Даль В. Пословицы русскаго народа. М.: Въ Университетской Тип., 1862.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dahl, V. (1862). Proverbs of the Russian people. Moscow: V Universitetskoy Tip. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Достоевскии Ф. М. Зимние заметки о летних впечатлениях // Достоевскии Ф. М. Полн. собр. соч. в 30 тт. Т. 5 / Под ред. Г. Фридлендера. Л.: Наука, 1973. С. 46–98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevsky, F. (1973). Winter notes on summer impressions. In: G. Fridlender, ed., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 5. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 46-98. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Достоевскии Ф. М. Г-н –бов и вопрос об искусстве // Достоевскии Ф. М. Полн. собр. соч. в 30 тт. Т. 18 / Под ред. В. Туниманова, Г. Фридлендера. 1978. С. 70–103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevsky, F. (1978). Mr. –bov and the question of art. In: V. Tunimanov and G. Fridlender, eds., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 18. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 70-103. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Достоевскии Ф. М. Дневник писателя // Достоевскии Ф. М. Полн. собр. соч. в 30 тт. Т. 23 / Под ред. Е. Кийко, Г. Фридлендера. 1981. С. 5–162.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevsky, F. (1981). The writer’s diary. In: E. Kiyko and G. Fridlender, eds., The complete works of F. Dostoevsky (30 vols). Vol. 23. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 5-162. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касаткина Т. О творящей природе слова. Онтологичность слова в творчестве Ф. М. Достоевского как основа «реализма в высшем смысле». М.: ИМЛИ РАН, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kasatkina, T. (2004). On the creative nature of the word. The ontology of the word in F. M. Dostoevsky’s works as the basis of ‘realism in the highest sense.’ Moscow: IMLI RAN. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касаткина Т. А. Достоевский как философ и богослов: художественный способ высказывания / Под ред. Е. Тахо-Годи. М.: Водолей, 2019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kasatkina, T. (2019). Dostoevsky as a philosopher and theologian: An artistic method of expression. Moscow: Vodoley. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касаткина Т. А. Особенности структуры ранних «гностических» текстов Достоевского: Анагогическая история // Достоевский и мировая культура. Филологический журнал. 2020. № 2 (10). С. 95–115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kasatkina, T. (2020). Anagogic story as the specifc structure of Dostoevsky’s early ‘gnostic’ texts. Dostoevsky i Mirovaya Kultura. Filologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2(10), pp. 95-115. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Магарил-Ильяева Т. Г. Фельетоны 1847 года как «толковый словарь» философии раннего творчества Ф. М. Достоевского // Достоевский и мировая культура. Филологический журнал. 2021. № 4 (16). С. 24–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Magaril-Iliaeva, T. (2021). The 1847 feuilletons as a dictionary of the philosophy of Dostoevsky’s early works. Dostoevsky i Mirovaya Kultura. Filologicheskiy Zhurnal, 4(16), pp. 24-41. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михаилов А. В. Несколько тезисов о теории литературы // Литературоведение как проблема / Под ред Т. А. Касаткиной. М.: Наследие, 2001. С. 224–279.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhaylov, A. (2001). Several theses on the theory of literature. In: T. Kasatkina, ed., Literary criticism as a problem. Moscow: Nasledie, pp. 224- 279. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пушкин А. С. Собр. соч. в 10 тт. / Под общ. ред. Д. Благого и др. Т. 9. М.: ГИХЛ, 1962</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popova, I., ed. (2010). The collected works of M. Bakhtin (7 vols). Vol. 4. Part 2. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
