Pushkin’s epigram ‘Motion’ [‘Dvizhenie’] (1825) has fascinated scholars for years. However, all its interpretations relied on its external context — either philosophical or political. The article sets out to interpret ‘Motion’ in the light of the literary and polemic agenda that was on Pushkin’s mind at the time of the poem’s writing. Printed in the fourth issue of Küchelbecker’s Mnemozina for the year 1825, practically right before Pushkin’s ‘To the Sea’ [‘K moryu’], were Küchelbecker’s hexameters entitled ‘A hymn to Bacchus (from Homer)’ [‘Gimn Bakhusu (Iz Gomera)’], with a note of ‘Tsarskoe Selo, 1817.’ This may have seemed to Pushkin a reference to the dispute around hexameter (in the years 1813–1814 and 1817–1820); the episode with an argument between two philosophers was included in the response that S. Uvarov, a proponent of hexameter, wrote to V. Kapnist, who promoted the versification of Russian folk songs as an alternative to hexameter. This allows for the assumption that Pushkin’s epigram was addressed to Küchelbecker, with whom, since their time at the Lyceum, Pushkin had engaged in a dispute about the suitability of hexameter for Russian poetry.