<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voplit</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы литературы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy literatury</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31425/0042-8795-2021-2-92-115</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voplit-425</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ РУССКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ / А. П. Чехов</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE / A. P. Chekhov</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Опыт нарратологического прочтения. «Архиерей» Чехова</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>An experiment in narratological reading. The Bishop [Arkhierey] by Chekhov</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тюпа</surname><given-names>В. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tyupa</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Тюпа Валерий Игоревич - доктор филологических наук.</p><p>125047, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6, корп. 1.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Valery I. Tyupa - Doctor of Philology.</p><p>6/1 Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">v.tiupa@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российский государственный гуманитарный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian State University for the Humanities</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>115</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury», 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Avtonomnaja nekommercheskaja organizacija Redakcija zhurnala kritiki i literaturovedenija «Voprosy literatury»</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.voplit.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/425">https://www.voplit.com/jour/article/view/425</self-uri><abstract><p>Аналитическое описание системы эпизодов рассказа «Архиерей» демонстрирует своеобразие и возможности нарратологического подхода к изучению литературы. Выявляется принадлежность чеховского шедевра к прецедентной (в данном случае евангельской) картине мира. Нарративное содержание текста рассматривается как актуализация сакрального исторического события в малозначительном событии повседневного существования.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article showcases the distinctive characteristics and analytical powers of the narratological approach to examination of a literary text as a system of episodes comprising a unique subject of the artistic whole. The author specifies the typological concept of the narrative picture of the world as the basis for accurate understanding of epic literature. An analytical description of the system of episodes in the short story The Bishop [Arkhierey] reveals the consistency of Chekhov's masterpiece with the precedential (in this case, evangelical) picture of the world. The story's narrative content is examined as an artistic actualisation of a sacred historical event in an incident of a private quotidian existence. The proposed interpretation of the story polemicises with that offered by the German narratology scholar W. Schmid, who denies the eventfulness of the protagonist's metamorphosis and views his epiphany with skepticism.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>А. Чехов</kwd><kwd>«Архиерей»</kwd><kwd>Евангелие</kwd><kwd>воскресение</kwd><kwd>нарратология</kwd><kwd>система эпизодов</kwd><kwd>картина мира</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>A. Chekhov</kwd><kwd>The Bishop [Arkhierey]</kwd><kwd>the gospel</kwd><kwd>resurrection</kwd><kwd>narratology</kwd><kwd>a system of episodes</kwd><kwd>the world picture</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда, проект № 20-18-00417.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study has been funded by the Russian Science Foundation, project № 20-18-00417.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахтин М. М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. М.: Художественная литература, 1975.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakhtin, M. (1975). Questions of literature and aesthetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахтин М. М. Собр. соч. в 7 тт. Т. 1 / Отв. ред. С. Бочаров, Н. Николаев. М.: Русские словари; Языки славянской культуры, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belchikov, N., ed. (1977). The complete works and letters of A. Chekhov (30 vols). Vol. 9. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Катаев В. Б. Проза Чехова: Проблемы интерпретации. М.: МГУ, 1979. Лотман Ю. М. Структура художественного текста. М.: Искусство, 1970. Лотман Ю. М. Об искусстве. СПб.: Искусство-СПБ, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bocharov, S. and Nikolaev, N., eds. (2003). The collected works of M. Bakhtin (7 vols). Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мейлах Б. М. Талант писателя и процессы творчества. Л.: Советский писатель, 1969.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florensky, P. (2011). Names. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika. (In Russ.) Freidenberg, O. (1978). Myth and ancient literature. Moscow: Nauka, GRVL. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поспелов Г. Н. Проблемы литературного стиля. М.: МГУ, 1970.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kataev, V. (1979). Chekhov's prose: Problems of interpretation. Moscow: MGU. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рикер П. Время и рассказ / Перевод с фр. Т. В. Славко. В 2 тт. М.; СПб.: Университетская книга, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lotman, Y. (1970). The structure of the artistic text. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сергеенко П. А. Толстой и его современники. М.: Изд. В. М. Саблина, 1911.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lotman, Y. (2005). On art. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB. (In Russ.) Meylakh, B. (1969). The writer's talent and creative processes. Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смирнов И. П. Текстомахия: как литература отзывается на философию. СПб.: Петрополис, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Perelman C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Степанов А. Д. Проблемы коммуникации у Чехова. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pospelov, G. (1970). The problems of literary style. Moscow: MGU. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флоренский П. Имена. СПб.: Азбука-классика, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ricreur, P. (2000). Time and story. T. 1-2. Translated by T. Slavko. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фрейденберг О. М. Миф и литература древности. М.: Наука, ГРВЛ, 1978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmid, W. (1998). Prose as poetry: Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Chekhov, the avant-garde. 2nd revised and expanded ed. St. Petersburg: Inapress. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чехов А. П. Полн. собр. соч. и писем в 30 тт. / Гл. ред. Н. Ф. Бельчиков. Т. 9. М.: Наука, 1977.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmid, W. (2008). Narratology. 2nd revised and corrected ed. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шмид В. Проза как поэзия: Пушкин, Достоевский, Чехов, авангард. 2-е изд., испр. и расшир. СПб.: Инапресс, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sergeenko, P. (1911). Tolstoy and his contemporaries. Moscow: Izd. V. M. Sablina. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шмид В. Нарратология. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smirnov, I. (2010). Textomakhia: How literature responds to philosophy. St. Petersburg: Petropolis. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perelman C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stepanov, A. (2005). Communication problems in Chekhov. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tjupa V. Narrative strategies // Handbook of narratology. Vol. 2 / Ed. by P. Huhn, W. Schmid, J. C. Meister et al. 2nd ed. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2014. P. 564-574.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tjupa, V. (2014). Narrative strategies. In: P. Huhn, W. Schmid, J. C. Meister et al., eds., Handbook of narratology. Vol. 2. 2nd revised and expanded ed. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 564-574.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
